JoeBoBBY
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,631
- Reaction score
- 1,691
I'd take Charles due to health security, but that is the only reason. I've said time and time again, the criticism of Murray and injuries is a valid one. Didn't want him back because of that? Understandable, though even then he only had one truly injury plagued season (2012). But we are discussing talent here, and Murray is just as good a runner and receiver as Jamaal Charles (Statistics prove this).
And no, that's not how it works in the NFL. AD needs to prove he's STILL the best RB on the planet. You don't dish out money and draft picks for something a player did 2 years ago.
Well, I agree with you that Murray was an above average back. The guy is solid...you dont run for 1800 yards without having any talent. But, you cant pay Murray that ridiculous salary he got, and you have indicated you feel that way too.
So, with that knowledge you need to find a suitable replacement for him or the Cowboys are going to be taking a serious step backwards. In a year they should be pushing forward.
So, as of right now, are choices are, DMF, Williams, Randle, Dunbar; And a rookie.
or
Trade for AP.
I would say you dont trust a rookie to carry the load in a year your pushing for the Super Bowl, based off what he did in College....