sandbridge77
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 585
- Reaction score
- 687
Now that we had determined that football is fake, anybody have any insight on this Santa Claus guy?
It’s probably time to close this thread because it’s obvious it’s become nothing more than trolling now even admitting to incite me for entertainment.Still invested, deputy dog.
Provide something more than a gif of a missed call or be relegated to tin foil hat world.
Wow do you think you guys might be able to go back about 20 pages and read what I've written probably 10 or 15 times by now so I don't have to keep going over it.
I don't understand why there would be so many blowouts, or why there would ever be a team that goes winless or nearly winless in a season, if that were the goal. Even the smaller markets make a lot of money, and to keep those fans more interested would certainly make sense, fiscally speaking.That is certainly a possibility in one way of doing it but I don't believe the players have anything to do with it.
My opinion is the players play hard and play to win.
I believe the league has people who monitor the viewing audience very carefully and when games start to lose the viewing audience because of a lopsided score they use the officials to get things back under control and stop from losing the viewing audience.
I believe it's just part of the officials job to keep things entertaining and competitive when directed to do so by the league.
I doubt Vegas would be on board with a scandal to this degree. If it were ever found out (which it would be) they'd lose big. Not only would there be lawsuits, but the lack of good faith would hurt their industry for decades.Profit is the utmost priority
Vegas would be on board with anything that would make them more profit.
Correct it makes no difference who wins as long as the games are competitive.
The obsessed and overly invested are unable to process what greed makes people do.
@Blackrain is making plausible arguments, even if we don't all agree with them. He's also do it in a respectful manner.Still invested, deputy dog.
Provide something more than a gif of a missed call or be relegated to tin foil hat world.
A valid point, whether you believe they're "out to get us" or not.You say the refs are told by the owners to keep the games close so viewers will not turn the game off, but the Packer game was in OT, the score was tied at the end of regulation. There was no need for the refs to do anything to keep viewership but the refs screwed us anyways in OT just for the hell of it?
So which is it? Do the refs manipulate calls to keep the game close to keep viewers interested or are the refs out to screw the Cowboys? Because these are two completely different things because a lot of these so called "phantom penalties" against Dallas happen when the score is relatively close, meaning there is no need for the refs to intervein to keep viewership.
See, I don't think the owners with the better teams would be willing to have the games artificially kept close. That doesn't make sense to me. I'm absolutely certain that these owners make so much money already, that their prime motivation is winning, even if they could somehow make more money by risking losses to the referees' discretion.Sometimes both because we happen to be in a lot of primetime games.
The refs aren't told directly by the owners in my opinion they are directed by the league but the owners have given the league permission to do what's necessary to maximize viewing audience and profit
What other possible reason could there be for not being able to review CDs catch after it happened during the time out we took before the field goal or before we took the field to kick the field goal.Look at what happened right before halftime in the Vikings game That's exactly what I'm talking about.
Hang on a second I'm strapping my tin foil hat on real tight okay I'm good
I believe there was some bean counter monitoring the viewing audience and as we were beating the Vikings it came down that they did not want us to make a field goal right before halftime that if we made a 60-yard field goal they were going to lose a lot of viewing audience.
What other possible reason could there be for not being able to review CDs catch after it happened during the time out we took before the field goal or before we took the field to kick the field goal.
No they waited till our kicker kicked a 60-yard field goal then told us they were going to review the catch figuring there was no way he could kick another 60 yd field goal but he did it and that game ran off the rails on them and there was nothing they could do to get it under control that wouldn't have appeared crazily obvious.
That was bad what were they going to do next come out and hit our kicker with a chair That was an absolute terrible display of officiating
I never thought I would see a thread like this going 31 pages. I never seen anything like it.
The one on the old site was ridiculously long, and mostly on topic!……well then you haven’t seen the “Bacon” thread
I don't understand why there would be so many blowouts, or why there would ever be a team that goes winless or nearly winless in a season, if that were the goal. Even the smaller markets make a lot of money, and to keep those fans more interested would certainly make sense, fiscally speaking.
The league created parity through the salary cap and free agency. I think that's all the manipulation necessary.
What other possible reason could there be for not being able to review CDs catch after it happened during the time out we took before the field goal or before we took the field to kick the field goal.
Ineptitude, pure and simple. Maybe it was a decision they made earlier, but they just forgot to inform the teams. or maybe the Vikings talked them into reviewing it. There are plenty of plausible explanations that have nothing to do with the refs manipulating the score.
I agree that it was an injustice. I just don't think they did it with malice. I haven't heard anything about it from the team. Did McCarthy say anything about them telling him just before the kick was made or any other details?I got to disagree with you there buddy They should have reviewed that thing right away or at least during the time out They never should have let him kick a 60-yard and then have to do it over That was a serious injustice in my mind.
You'd think if it was mostly directed at Prime Time games, Jerry would be trying to opt out of the Thanksgiving Day games. I think a lot of the Prime Time game are close because the league scheduled teams that were expected to be good matchups before the season even started. That, in my opinion, is the extent of their manipulation.Yep you would think they would stop at that but greed knows no bounds and I think these primetime just provide them an opportunity to make some more money
With a little manipulation as I've said I don't think it goes on on all the games several big primetime games a week of which we are usually involved because Jerry has somehow managed to get us on all the primetime games even though we haven't sniffed in NFC championship in 27 years have to hand it to him.
Whole thing could come from pressure from the sponsors if games are a runaway and their products aren't being watched by the right amount of viewers that they think should be watching them They may bring pressure to bear on the league hard to say
Just too many coincidences for me to believe that everything is on the up and up but that's just my opinion not trying to force it on anybody
he is not fake. he is real. I met him at the mall the other day and shook his hand....and his hands were cold....what further proof do you needNow that we had determined that football is fake, anybody have any insight on this Santa Claus guy?
You'd think if it was mostly directed at Prime Time games, Jerry would be trying to opt out of the Thanksgiving Day games. I think a lot of the Prime Time game are close because the league scheduled teams that were expected to be good matchups before the season even started. That, in my opinion, is the extent of their manipulation.