Section446
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,941
- Reaction score
- 11,619
Lol you've seen every game for every team and studied exactly how the play breaks down? Aha Roger that shipmate
Pretty much.
Lol you've seen every game for every team and studied exactly how the play breaks down? Aha Roger that shipmate
Don't have to, I've not missed an NFL game in 8 years, which includes every one of his games.
He's got great cut moves and can find the hole, Murray is a HR hitter from 20yds out but outside of that he gets gassed easily. Saying he's good for the first 10yds is not a compliment at all, any average back is good for at least 10.That's reducing Murray too much. He's quick for the first 10 yards. He just can't break away.
And McFadden has no wiggle at all and doesn't break tackles.
Thanks for the post, i will need a lot to drink to watch that much raiders footage
Nice work man... it is much appreciated.
You're much more than just a boat... you'll always be a big luxury liner in my book.
What would DeMarco Murray had done with those same plays? That's the question here.
Thanks for posting, this is why I love this site!
I don't think I'll subject myself to watching that much video on the Raiders, however, thank you for putting the time and effort in pulling this together and making it available us.
Posts like this are why I love CZ so much.
By the way, I noticed that you have 3.25 likes for every post that you make. That's gotta be unprecedented for the number of posts that you have. Take that, @Risen Star !
Huge thanks for putting this together! I'm looking forward to watching it this evening!
I think I just got injured trying to watch him run behind that line @itsaboat
As an exercise, I would bring my focuses back and just look for the DT and the los. They never move.
No, that article was terrible.
The way he used the stats would indicate Oakland's run game with their backups was better than the very best NFL rushing teams.
Players with less than 100 attempts per season normally have good rushing averages. Randle had a 6.7 ypc last year compared to 4.7 for Murray.
He selectively picked out runs were McFadden did not have success.
Sturm is normally very good, but that article was a complete fail. You just can't use stats the way he tried to use them.
Players with less than 100 attempts per season normally have good rushing averages. Randle had a 6.7 ypc last year compared to 4.7 for Murray.
What would DeMarco Murray had done with those same plays? That's the question here.
Its pretty sad to see by the time McF gets the ball his lineman has already been pushed back to the backfield. The Raiders O line just can't seem to get a push forward collectively.
And the flip question is, what would McFadden have done with all of Murray's opportunities? That is where I see McFadden as the lesser back.
Perhaps, he would have take a few to the house, but he also would have struggled with some of Murray's tougher runs.
Lol you've seen every game for every team and studied exactly how the play breaks down? Aha Roger that shipmate