ologan;2780606 said:There must be something completely wrong with me,because I think I'm the only person in this country that has never seen one single episode of this show. What is wrong with me??? Will I ever get over this malady?
Maybe the show just isn't for you. Nothing wrong with this. At least you are not ragging others who like the show.ologan;2780606 said:There must be something completely wrong with me,because I think I'm the only person in this country that has never seen one single episode of this show. What is wrong with me??? Will I ever get over this malady?
I'll say it again, out of 88 million votes last week, only 1 million votes separated Adam and Kris.EveryoneElse;2780583 said:I like what that poll shows, but Adam is going to win easily, she has the judges pulling for her.
theogt;2780747 said:I'll say it again, out of 88 million votes last week, only 1 million votes separated Adam and Kris.
It's going to be close.
Yeagermeister;2780750 said:I still find it hard to believe they get that many votes. Every week they break the record from the week before.
If the voting was rigged, I don't think think this site would be as accurate as it has been in its predictions:TheCount;2781265 said:Yeah, it's all bogus. The ratings have gone down but somehow the voting keeps going up.
theogt;2781372 said:If the voting was rigged, I don't think think this site would be as accurate as it has been in its predictions:
http://www.dialidol.com/asp/predictions/Predictions.asp
That doesn't make sense. The website uses a program that dials in and measures the busy signals and projects a winner based on that. Last year they correctly predicted 97% of the voting results.SultanOfSix;2781395 said:Wait, isn't accuracy kind of evidence for the notion that it is rigged?
Honestly, I don't think even the judges are pulling the strings, but people behind the scenes are.
theogt;2781580 said:That doesn't make sense. The website uses a program that dials in and measures the busy signals and projects a winner based on that. Last year they correctly predicted 97% of the voting results.
The website is predicting based on a system that measures votes. Votes are quantitatively measurable.SultanOfSix;2781592 said:No, the program claims to supposedly do that.
Regardless, typically if something is predicted so accurately, especially in something that is not quantitatively, but qualitatively measurable (singing voice) that is evidence for repeatability, or predictability, which tends to be evidence for fixing.