To address the crazy...
A) The offensive line argues against Zeke. In fact we know Zeke is slightly less productive than one would expect given the offensive line. Essentially he gets what is blocked. Go watch his 2018-2019 highlight video that was recently posted. It is a dull affair of running in open space and then being tackled. He doesn't break tackles and he doesn't make guys miss. He's just fed volume in a productive system. How did you watch Demarco blitzkrieg the league because of our offensive line and then turn around and fade from relevance as soon as he left the luxury of Smith and buddies and learn no lessons?
B) Zeke is ALREADY slowing down on his rookie contract. Put aside he couldn't be bothered to stay in shape BEFORE he got his big payday but Zeke ranked 15th last year in breakaway percentage. Turn to 2016 highlight tapes from Zeke and then put him on now. If you're telling me he's going to age gracefully like the best running back of all time... Well he's not off to a tremendous start.
C) If your rebuttal necessitates comparing Zeke to the greatest running back and one of the greatest players ever...and not to well documented history of the running bakc position... Get a new argument.
I went back to see what you have said in the past about Dak. I think this is important and germane to this discussion.
You said this in the
Dak Gets No Respect thread.
Why are the fans of this guy so willing to prop him up? Just because he's ours? He is a middling talent surrounded by actually very good players who gives a good interview.
And normally sane fans are willing to throw away their credibility forever to Stan for him. It's quite strange.
More about this in a moment.
You were very vocally against Murray. You cite his post Dallas career, yet ignore the fact the Eagles used him differently and did not have the Dallas line. His heyday for
Dallas - his last year here - he carried the ball 392 times.
His only season for the Eagles
he carried the ball 193 times. His average attempts per game
with Dallas was 24.5. With Philly it was 12.9 per game. Yet when he went to Tennessee they used him more like Dallas than the Eagles.
He carried the ball 293 times and averaged 18.3 attempts per game.
Apples to apples.
However, in this we both agree. Murray had a history of injuries and couldn't be trusted. My desire to keep him was his production.
But then came Zeke!
Further you cite last year's decline for Zeke in one category and seem to leave out the fact FredBeard was not on the field and Connor Williams was not muscled up enough to be a dominant guard. I suppose to you those factors are unimportant in Zeke's stats. Kind of like the number of carries Murray had for three different teams and his average per game carries. Interesting you don't consider those as factors in your push against both Murray and Zeke.
You also fail to take into account the league started playing Dallas different after his rookie season, crowding the line and forcing Dak to beat teams. Now since your comment above about Dak, one would suspect you are in agreement with this notion because of Daks dropping off and the ridiculous comment that Zeke
"essentially gets what is blocked."
I take that to mean his yards come only when the other team gets blocked. To a degree I want to say,
"No scat, Sherlock."
Correct this interpretation if I read it incorrectly.
But how very generous of you since other teams are seriously focusing on Zeke to put the onus on Dak. And you must agree with that because of you showing so much love for Dak in other threads like the one above.
What comes to mind here after your concerted negativity about Murray, Dak, and Zeke. I understand a show me attitude. I have that with Dak. Show me you can be the man. But looking at the black and white results and still find nothing worthwhile says a lot about your position.
The stacking the lines with 8 and 9 in the box would account for the breakaway percentage. For every action there is an equal reaction. The league stacks the box and Zeke's stats change because Dak can't back them off with the deep ball enough.
Just logic. Not crazy.
Finally to your point about Emmitt. I left off Emmitt's rookie season because Jimmy was teaching him a lesson about holding out. He had 937 yards or so.
EMMITT SMITH
..............Games..........Games started..........Rush..........Yards..........
1991......16..................16...............................365.............1561
1992......16..................16...............................371.............1713
1993......14..................13 (hold out).............283.............1486
1994......15..................15..............................368..............1484
1995......16..................16..............................377..............1773
The seasons from 1991 to 1995 Emmitt averaged 22.88 carries per game
The next seven years as a Cowboy he averaged
292 carries per season
The next seven seasons as a Cowboy he posted
8206 yards
The next seven years as a Cowboy he averaged
15.42 per games per season
Ezekiel Elliott
2016.....15.................15...............................322.................1631
2017.....10.................10...............................242.................983
2018.....15.................15...............................304.................1434
Through Zeke's career, he has averaged 21.7 carries per game.
Emmitt's first three seasons (including his rookie campaign) he totaled 4211 yards, playing in 47 games, averaging 20.4 touches per game.
Total carries in first three years - 979
Zeke's first three seasons (without Aikman, Irvin, and the defense and winning one super bowl) totaled 4048 yards playing in 40 games (7 less than Emmitt), averaging 21.7 touches per game.
Total carries in first three years - 868
To sum up Zeke carried the ball 101 less times in 7 less games - without a HOF QB, HOF Receiver, a defense that took them to the Super Bowl, including a HOF defensive end and won - and came up short on yardage against the GOAT and HOF Emmitt Smith by 163 yards. With Dak - whom you think is about average as a QB. Apples to apples. So I can damn sure compare these two guys in the same time frame, and factor in the team around them and make the case Zeke is more than special.
One last point. You said this to me in a thread about Zeke.
What about without Zeke and 50MM to spend?
And I say again, looking at these stats and the history of the two players - which I mentioned to you in this thread - and considering the front office and their hijinx and inability to put a team on the field for over twenty years that can get to the NFC Championship game,
What the Hell does 50 MM mean in regard to having potentially one of the best running backs in this era, knowing Jerry couldn't find his butt with a road map and a tour guide in regard to getting to a championship game?
You toss around people who see things in players you question as crazy or insane. Perhaps what is closer to the truth is you are somewhat color blind.
I respect you as a poster. But disgruntled is not your shade.