Antonio Bryant is reinstated by NFL and is a free agent

CowboyJeff;1655572 said:
sign Antonio and then sign O.J. since we're not sure about Julius....

I do have standards........and well, OJ crosses that line. :laugh2:
 
CrazyCowboy;1655709 said:
I do have standards........and well, OJ crosses that line. :laugh2:

I agree --Tank has done his time ---Bryant crazy---Oj (no matter what the jury of his "peers" said is guilty.
 
Beast_from_East;1655569 said:
For league min.............I would give him a shot.

If he leaves the reservation you hand him a bus ticket, just like our deal with Tank.

Its about winning guys, nothing else matters.:)

He is young and maybe... just maybe you do plug him as #2 opposite TO. We are talking about winning right? not about other WR's feelings.




joseephuss;1655686 said:
AB did not like being behind guys when he was in Dallas 3 years ago. Why would he accept a back up role now?

He thinks he should be the #1 go to guy. I think he has the physical talents to be that type of receiver and his dropped passes are over blown. Every receiver drops passes. He just does not have that mental aspect to be the top receiver. The willingness to be a team guy and whatever else it takes to be truly elite. He did not have it in 2004 and got traded. I don't see why he would be different now.

He is still young(26) and I am sure some team will pick him up eventually, but it won't be Dallas unless the Cowboys get decimated by injuries.

Yes, he is young. He is talented. He can be had for cheap. I think Wade would be able to work with this kid. Garrett can draw up some nice plays for AB.
 
http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1626844#post1626844

I don't know if we will look at him or not but I did make a prediction a couple of weeks ago when we found out Glenn was injured again.

It would not surprise me. Hurd has done OK and so has Crayton. How often are they getting open though - that is the question. Hurd made a huge play in the giants game and a couple catches in the Miami game but I don't think anybody is wooried about accounting for him yet and that is the key to making TO and Witten even mores successful.

That said, Bryant must be a huge pain in the butt for the two teams that he did pretty well with to say "your not worth the effort" and that is what Cleveland and SF basically said.

T.O. has been fine but I don't think Romo could take another WR yelling in his ear for the ball.
 
Was it AB that caught that pass from Quincy a few years back after the Giants had kicked it out of bounds, setting up the game-winning FG with seconds to spare?
 
YoMick;1655766 said:
Garrett can draw up some nice plays for AB.

And then AB can ignore them and run whatever the heck he wants again.
 
Bryant was already here ..... and learned nothing from our rehabilitation program ...

He already had his chance with us ..... He will not be back.
 
AB has failed at every NFL stop in his career. Not once, not twice, but three times. So what magical mystical pixie dust has he been sniffing that makes you think he's changed?
 
M'Kevon;1655901 said:
AB has failed at every NFL stop in his career. Not once, not twice, but three times. So what magical mystical pixie dust has he been sniffing that makes you think he's changed?


All I am saying is...

Bill was Bill... he is NOT for everyone
He was with the Browns... you can equate that to Moss in Oakland
Then to the 49'ers... rebuilding

If he comes here... he will either be part of something that is working or he will canned. Its rather easy.
 
YoMick;1656459 said:
All I am saying is...

Bill was Bill... he is NOT for everyone
He was with the Browns... you can equate that to Moss in Oakland
Then to the 49'ers... rebuilding

If he comes here... he will either be part of something that is working or he will canned. Its rather easy.

He was already here. He was already canned here. next......
 
I don't know about you guys, but Hurd reminds me a lot of Bryant in appearance.

The way they walk and run......Part of it in the way they look in the face.

As to the original question.

No.
 
The Cowboys do not need Bryant, period! Yeah, some posters say that the Cowboys will give a second chance to Tank, T.O. and a few others, but this guy is a total nut case! Three teams, three releases? After only one year or so?

Nope!

Bryant was a part of the QC mess and it was documented (no. i'm not going to go find it, either take my word for it or don't)that QC and Bryant would freelance during games and get away from the actual called play. This was brought up in a meeting by the vets with Emmitt actually verfying it to to the coaches during the meeting! Prior to this meeting, it was said the QC even went to some of the vets to ask them not to tell on him and Bryant because QC knew what this meeting was going to be about...

Bryant has nothing between the ears except air...and to think, I was very excited when he was drafted....:bang2:

The only way the Cowboys should sign him is if T.O., Hurd, Crayton and Austin get shot by one of Tank's automatic weapons!! And even then, it would be a question mark!
 
YoMick;1656459 said:
All I am saying is...

Bill was Bill... he is NOT for everyone
He was with the Browns... you can equate that to Moss in Oakland
Then to the 49'ers... rebuilding

If he comes here... he will either be part of something that is working or he will canned. Its rather easy.

There's just no need.

By the time he's up to speed with the offense, Glenn may be a couple of weeks away from coming back.

When Glenn gets back, he goes to #4 by default. He couldn't stop whining about not getting passes when he was a #2-3 here, what's he gonna do when he sees the field 3 plays a game?

And do you really think he will play special teams, which is what #4 WRs are expected to do?

PLus he blocks the potential progress of Hurd and Austin, bot of whom ARE good special teams players.

Just doesn't seem to be any upside here at all, unless he does a complete 180and somehow beats out Crayton for a job.
 
His stats from last year....

Not bad.

GP 14
Catches 40
Yds 733
Avg. 18.3
TDS 3
First Downs 31


He's a fast WR who can catch and make first downs.
 
Tempting but I'd pass too. Cowboys are gonna have a lot on their plate with Tank Johnson and making sure he comes around. I think Crayton's a good enough #2 (not the best but...good enough) and Hurd/Austin have the potential to show the kind of spart/clutch play at #3 that Crayton has had for the Cowboys.
 
eduncan22;1656528 said:
His stats from last year....

Not bad.

GP 14
Catches 40
Yds 733
Avg. 18.3
TDS 3
First Downs 31


He's a fast WR who can catch and make first downs and then get kicked off the team after a year...


Fixed...


:cool:
 
You guys arent thinking like Jerry Jones...

Until Jerry DOESNT do it... its possible he may.... thats all I am saying....


"we will never sign TO"
"we will never sign Tank"


I mean really....
 
YoMick;1656542 said:
You guys arent thinking like Jerry Jones...

Until Jerry DOESNT do it... its possible he may.... thats all I am saying....


"we will never sign TO"
"we will never sign Tank"


I mean really....


Come on, YoMick, honestly! Where would he fit? Why would you sign a guy that does not play special teams? Why sign a guy where there is really no need?

Bryan and T.O. would probably go togeather like peanut butter and liver! :cool:

The guy is a talent, but he's a bigger head case than T.O or Tank, period! Would you rather give up on some real young promising reciever just to have a nut case on the team who might catch 3 or 4 balls a game and then moan and groan all the time because he's not a number one reciever!

Get real, my friend...!

Are you on any medication?

:confused:
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,942
Messages
13,906,284
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top