Any news on Henson?

CrazyCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,287
Reaction score
440
Dale said:
I think that's part of the problem. We draft a raw kid in the second round, or pluck a guy off a baseball team, etc...and the expectations are that they "become the guy." Granted, part of the reason is because of the hype the team puts out about the guys.

It's enough pressure on a highly-talented guy taken No. 1 in the draft. IMO, it's even more when being put on guys selected in the latter rounds.

Imagine if Tom Brady had been expected to save the Patriots' franchise his first and second years in the league. Would the scenario have worked out as well as it did? I'm not so sure.

Dale,

I just want to say thanks for taking the time out of your busy schedule to give us this summarization of Henson progress. Speaking on behalf of the other Zoners......we appreciate all you do.

Wish I was out there with you this year.......

Thanks!
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
HeavyHitta31 said:
Thanks for proving my point!!! My point is you dont always take the more talented player, you take the better player. Sometimes, you do take talent because they are better, sometimes you dont. dbair unintenially gets owned by someone trying to support him :lmao:

nobody is owning anything...anyone making a Randall Cunningham over Troy Aikman argument really doesnt warrant being argued with...

the only thing Cunningham ever had on a guy like Aikman was his scrambling ability...when it comes to actually DOING the things most important for a QB to do (quick drops, quick reads, precision accuracy, accurate reads, ability to make eveyr throw) Cunningham was nowhere near the talent a guy like Aikman was...

David
 

The30YardSlant

Benched
Messages
24,287
Reaction score
0
dbair1967 said:
when was Cunningham stronger? when was Cunningham's arm stronger? Aikman made intermediate throws with accuracy and velocity that Cunningham could never dream of...as for faster, dont know what Cunningham ran but Aikman was a 4.6 guy at 220lbs coming out of UCLA

he was a better scrambler, but who cares? I want a QB who can read defenses, get rid of the ball quickly and accurately and gun it when he needs to...all those factors go into QB "talent", and Aikman was one of the highest rated prospects ever in those areas...

David

That's fine, but Aikman was no the athlete Cunningham was. Randall was a better athlete, and the better athlete is defined as someone who has more natural, go-given skills.
 

BHendri5

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,151
Reaction score
1,414
Banned_n_austin said:
I wouldn't be surprised if Henson gets cut ... it's been apparent to me since last year that Parcells doesn't have a very high opinion about Henson ...


I feel the same as you. I still say that Henson was forced on BP, by Jerry.
I cannot see how any HOF coach would go thru the same scenario back to back. Same guys just different last names, but both start with an H.

I hope this kid does something, or get cut so that I can stop reading these whiney posts. I still say the kid is holding a roster spot hostage, and if Romo is not looking any better then he is holding a roster spot hostage too.

But I believe Romo is doing better than people are saying.
 

gbrittain

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,126
Reaction score
67
HeavyHitta31 said:
I prefer Nostradumba** myself

We'll see on Saturday

Unfortunately, I guess...I have not read the entire thread. Not sure what Dbair said, but unless he maintains that Cunningham was a better QB than Aikman he did not get "owned".

Anyone who believes Cunningham was a better QB than Aikman may as well believe Dominque Wilkins was a better basketball player than Michael Jordan.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
BHendri5 said:
I feel the same as you. I still say that Henson was forced on BP, by Jerry.
I cannot see how any HOF coach would go thru the same scenario back to back. Same guys just different last names, but both start with an H.

I hope this kid does something, or get cut so that I can stop reading these whiney posts. I still say the kid is holding a roster spot hostage, and if Romo is not looking any better then he is holding a roster spot hostage too.

But I believe Romo is doing better than people are saying.
Hypocrite alert. What happened to 3 years to develop?
 

BigDFan5

Cowboys Make me Drink
Messages
15,109
Reaction score
546
HeavyHitta31 said:
If Henson is great and plays well, then I was wrong about him being a bad QB. I have no problem saying it. Evcen if it is preseason, you have to be fairly good to play a great game as a QB.

So now he has to be great? define great
 

The30YardSlant

Benched
Messages
24,287
Reaction score
0
BHendri5 said:
I feel the same as you. I still say that Henson was forced on BP, by Jerry.
I cannot see how any HOF coach would go thru the same scenario back to back. Same guys just different last names, but both start with an H.

I hope this kid does something, or get cut so that I can stop reading these whiney posts. I still say the kid is holding a roster spot hostage, and if Romo is not looking any better then he is holding a roster spot hostage too.

But I believe Romo is doing better than people are saying.

While I agree, please stop acting like you've always felt this way. You said yourself a QB needs alot of time.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
HeavyHitta31 said:
That's fine, but Aikman was no the athlete Cunningham was. Randall was a better athlete, and the better athlete is defined as someone who has more natural, go-given skills.

now we're to who's the better athlete?

so what, Cunningham could scramble better...that certainly doesnt make him the better talent

David
 

Kilyin

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,041
Reaction score
244
That's fine, but Aikman was no the athlete Cunningham was. Randall was a better athlete, and the better athlete is defined as someone who has more natural, go-given skills

Different types of athleticism, but make no mistake Aikman was an athlete, and a damn tough one.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
HeavyHitta31 said:
I dont know.....

Completes 60-65% of his passes, no INTs (unless he throws ALOT of passes), at least 1-2 TDs.
You have a warped scale.
 

The30YardSlant

Benched
Messages
24,287
Reaction score
0
dbair1967 said:
now we're to who's the better athlete?

so what, Cunningham could scramble better...that certainly doesnt make him the better talent

David

PHYSICAL SKILLS are what you have without having to learn. Speed, agility, strength, etc are physical skills. By that definition, Randall was the better PHYSICAL player. I wont argue for a second that Troy was smarter, or had a better pocket presense, but those are things that are leanred from experiance.
 

The30YardSlant

Benched
Messages
24,287
Reaction score
0
Hostile said:
You have a warped scale.

I'm not asking for Peyton Manning here, but if he cant do that against the 2nd-3rd team defense of a bottom dwelling team, he's in trouble.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
HeavyHitta31 said:
PHYSICAL SKILLS are what you have without having to learn. Speed, agility, strength, etc are physical skills. By that definition, Randall was the better PHYSICAL player. I wont argue for a second that Troy was smarter, or had a better pocket presense, but those are things that are leanred from experiance.
I tell you it's huevos.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
HeavyHitta31 said:
I'm not asking for Peyton Manning here, but if he cant do that against the 2nd-3rd team defense of a bottom dwelling team, he's in trouble.
Wrong.

All you ask of QBs in game 1 of Pre-season is to move the chains, sustain drives, and if the scores come, they come.

You do not put pre-conceived numbers and say anything less is failure or proof.

Premature evaluation. Just like all the "proof" that someone had what it takes based on 1 pass here or there.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
HeavyHitta31 said:
PHYSICAL SKILLS are what you have without having to learn. Speed, agility, strength, etc are physical skills. By that definition, Randall was the better PHYSICAL player. I wont argue for a second that Troy was smarter, or had a better pocket presense, but those are things that are leanred from experiance.

where do you have anything to document that Cunningham was faster or stronger? judging from their builds I'd say Aikman was alot stronger physically than Cunningham

and you were arguing that Cunningham was more talented...as I pointed out there are alot of things that go into talent, and for a QB there are ALOT of things more important than how fast you can run or how high you can jump

David
 
Top