rambo2
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 21,740
- Reaction score
- 15,733
Yes wow. Parsons, Williams, Smith, Lawrence, Osa, and so on. Outstanding!wow. Just wow.
Yes wow. Parsons, Williams, Smith, Lawrence, Osa, and so on. Outstanding!wow. Just wow.
Pugh, Lilly, Cole and Andrie blow that entire group out of the waterYes wow. Parsons, Williams, Smith, Lawrence, Osa, and so on. Outstanding!
Lol, you clearly don't understand how much better this group is. So, Larry Cole is better than Parsons? That's ridiculous.Pugh, Lilly, Cole and Andrie blow that entire group out of the water
Too Tall, Harvey, Manster and Dutton as well.
Clearly you have no knowledge of Cowboys history
Lol, you clearly don't understand how much better this group is. So, Larry Cole is better than Parsons? That's ridiculous.
Larry Cole was a lineman. I guess you really do know nothing. This thread is about DTs but clearly you do not careLol, you clearly don't understand how much better this group is. So, Larry Cole is better than Parsons? That's ridiculous.
Smith, Hankins, Osa, put them all in a time machine and send them back. The world would freak out. Do you realize how much stronger, bigger and faster these guys are?Larry Cole was a lineman. I guess you really do know nothing. This thread is about DTs but clearly you do not care
Show me one DT we have that could beat out any DT on those groups. Lilly, Cole, Dutton and Manster. Come on expert, show me.
That old chestnut is such a joke.Smith, Hankins, Osa, put them all in a time machine and send them back. The world would freak out. Do you realize how much stronger, bigger and faster these guys are?
LolThat old chestnut is such a joke.
Well, those they are playing against are much bigger stronger and faster too. And WHAT have they accomplished compared to those GREAT DEFENSES?
So its irrelevent.
You really are pretty sad at this.
well, I think it was both inside and outside runs, because of what you said. we had trouble stopping the run in the middle, so when we focused more on stopping those, teams gashed us to the outside.the middle of the line was a sieve at times…..Quinn knows this is a priority
so for early downs. on 3rd downs, we need Osa, who can create pressure up the middle and push the pocket.Think you need two studs on the DL interior, Mazi & Hankins and then our ends should be able to pin there ears back on passing downs and just maintain outside control on runs.
You got nothing. Show me the rings; show me the Championship game appearances this D has.
running QBs gave us serious trouble; Fields humiliated Tank.well, I think it was both inside and outside runs, because of what you said. we had trouble stopping the run in the middle, so when we focused more on stopping those, teams gashed us to the outside.
Larry Cole was a lineman. I guess you really do know nothing. This thread is about DTs but clearly you do not care
Show me one DT we have that could beat out any DT on those groups. Lilly, Cole, Dutton and Manster. Come on expert, show me.
Maybe because the offense was so inept the 49rs really were not trying.
Think about that.
Enjoy the show.You got nothing. Show me the rings; show me the Championship game appearances this D has.
Come on
Show me.
Show me the great defensive performances like those great defenses had
The Dallas D was already considered a top unit by 1966. And stayed that way with a few blips until the middle 1980's. Right around 20 years of a championship caliber D.It's easy to say after they're retired with rings. But I'm sure your confidence level in year 2 and 3 was right where it is now considering before they won any championships Lily was there for 10 years, Cole 4, Randy 6. And by the time Dutton got there those championship seasons were already in the rear window.
I enjoy your humiliation moreEnjoy the show.
total yards does matter. its either via higher YPC average or giving big run plays if below average, then its the number of runs and success of each run leading you to 3rd and short yardage situations.Total yards doesn't matter, YPC doesn't account for game situation (i.e. Chicago).
Try again with adult numbers.
No, it does not. It is either reflective of the team losing big because the offense is struggling or winning big and letting the other team run - i.e. Chicago.total yards does matter.