LMAO.. You people are amazing.. The ball was barely head high but the DB nearly jumps into the stratosphere to go get it. Riddle me this.. If the ball was "barely head high" why is the DB who is 3 feet off the ground and stretched out fully just to get his hands on it? Or are you saying the DB was 11 feet tall? Blame? Look Jarwin got beat three times on this play.. First the DB beats him to the his path to the corner of the end zone.. Then when the ball is thrown the DB beats him back to inside position .. then to add insult to injury the DB outjumped him for the ball. Maybe Jarwin is not all the way back physically from the ACL injury became my memory is of him being more athletic than that.. But in this case.. he got beat plain and simple..
The DB's stretching across, not vertically. You argue against yourself when you say we need a tall receiver....we had that miss match in Jarwin vrs Adderley (4" difference)....however for that to be effective you throw the ball to a position that benefits the height and takes the DB out of the play .....which in that case is higher.
If you look at Brady/Gronk, the accuracy of the throw is as important as the TE's physical attributes.
Im not absolving Jarwin from 'blame' (but he's a limited TE, especially physically and he's probably TE2, I would prefer more Schultz), but it's you who starting the thread and continue this blinkered view that Dak's got no weaknesses.
Dak is like the pitcher who needs the catcher's mitt in position for him to hit, he's unable to visualize the projected target which also results in a number of underthrown balls which land in positions the receiver was in , rather than were he's run to.