coult44
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,817
- Reaction score
- 7,590
I would like to see what his record against WINNING teams is. Thats where you separate the men from the boys imo. That and playoff record.
4-21 against perineal powers.
I would like to see what his record against WINNING teams is. Thats where you separate the men from the boys imo. That and playoff record.
It is deliciousLove the Kraken. I straight sip that when I want a sweet sipper.
It's a process.Interesting that all the teams (except Jets and Chargers) JG has a losing record with have either won or been to a SB in last decade.
Apparently a very, very, very loooooong process.It's a process.
two more years at least.Apparently a very, very, very loooooong process.
Can he learn the Pederson process?Apparently a very, very, very loooooong process.
Like Chinese water torture... Death by a thousand drips.Apparently a very, very, very loooooong process.
He had a great QB and didn't do anything with him. That's all I need to know.
FYPIt's a career process.
That's a fair question, and I don't have an answer. I'll pose another question though- what if Dak takes a big step back this year, and the team suffers as a result? Do you fire the coach based on a bad record caused by poor QB play? There's some judgment involved here, and more nuance than the "Garrett Haters Support Group" likes to admit.
I can't speak for TB and Atlanta., but I swear Leon Lett put some voodoo on us in that ice bowl game against The fins. been a train wreck ever since!Miami, TB, and Atlanta have our number for some reason... Thanks for the post.
And thanks for proving everything I've said thus far. Well done.
That's a fair question, and I don't have an answer. I'll pose another question though- what if Dak takes a big step back this year, and the team suffers as a result? Do you fire the coach based on a bad record caused by poor QB play? There's some judgment involved here, and more nuance than the "Garrett Haters Support Group" likes to admit.
The only thing that has been proven is that what your posts lack in quality, you make up for in quantity.
Mike Zimmer had a decision to make regarding the QB situation in Minnesota this off season. He said “It's important for myself and (general manager) Rick [Spielman] and the organization that we pick the right guy that is going to help us continue to move forward. If we don't do that, then I'll probably get fired,”
https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...mmer-minnesota-vikings-qb-decision/385768002/
Jason Garrett on the All or Nothing show pointed to himself talking about "ultimate accountability" after the disappointing 2017 season.
If Dak takes a huge step back, then there should be no excuse for the coaching staff. They need to coach up, not down. They decided to roll with Dak over Romo and I have no issue with that. They made their bed though. Make it work, no excuses.
No doubt not drafting an elite QB was Bills downfall here. I agree!Again, lower standards. Bill was a good roster builder. But his predictable, over the hill coaching was done for. And any fool that thought we were going to win with Quincy "the bong" Carter, Testicleverde, and Bledslow at QB needs to get the heck out of dodge.
if dak takes a big step back then yes its on the head coach he made the final decision that he was his starting qb his staff should have him ready to play no more excusesThat's a fair question, and I don't have an answer. I'll pose another question though- what if Dak takes a big step back this year, and the team suffers as a result? Do you fire the coach based on a bad record caused by poor QB play? There's some judgment involved here, and more nuance than the "Garrett Haters Support Group" likes to admit.