That's because the play design can be poor....but Dak still throws the ball. How come we have certain fans, yourself included, lauding the offensive stats one minute, then decrying the design as soon as there's a stat (like INTERCEPTIONS or QBR) which doesnt suit.
The play design is poor with two receivers playing high/low routes, and I did say I WONDER if it's due to Dak's issue with his speed of progression...... you conveniently missed out the view that a more simplified snappier WCO may suit him.....but you probably didnt get that far as your blood was already boiling way before then.
that's not what you said. you clearly said, its because Dak has a tendency to blah blah blah .........that says, they poor play design is "by design".
and you still didn't answer the ball hit Brown's in the hands....third frame clearly shows that. if you only saw that frame what would you say?
why aren't you placing the blame on Brown not making a play that was there and allowing the ball to bounce out of his hands.
and if you look at the 4th frame you clearly see brown crossed his hands allowing the ball to bounce off his hands, instead of cradling it in.
and you are continuously spinning and contradicting yourself. first you said, Dak can't read both sides of the field. lets assume that notion is true. then why put two WRs less than 10 yards of each other in the same space on the same side of the field? not only that, your argument of high/low falls apart, again, looking at the 3rd frame, both recievers have turned around and looking back for the ball, within the same space and same depth. couldn't perhaps Brown ran to the outside, giving him easier separation instead of the route running into the teeth of the DB field? couldn't the play design have Schultz running up field, forcing the DB to make decision, either to go across to cover brown or follow schultz? as a result one of the WRs would have a better chance of being open.
this was p!ss poor play call and play design. no other way around it. its not putting the players in a position to succeed. its a page out of Garrett play book and says, the players have to execute perfectly for the play to work and then there is those who argued Garrett and Moore don't scheme the players open.
and again, you are trying to spin away. you obviously either have a lack of how football routes or you have an agenda to drive and don't want to admit that you were wrong because you have a great deal of bias.
and btw, WCO is not simple. its as complex or more complex than a timing offense, so even that argument falls apart. however, again you try to make it sound that way, because you have an agenda to drive and you have to stick to your agenda.
there has been zero objectivity in our analysis.
