My first post mentioned the Jets game because he was talking about the Jets game. It's there in my quote of him. Don't be pedantic. I didn't bring them up first. He didn't play great against the Jets. He played well enough, but that's a far cry from claiming he had a stellar game and won it himself. Don't like my posts? Don't reply to me. I'm sick of trying to reason with people who've constantly twisted things to fit their narrative (Not you) and was responding accordingly until YOU butted into my conversation with him.
And if you're going to claim I said something, at least be correct. I said the defense did most of the work, I never once said they did everything. It helps when you're at least accurate in your accusations.
Now let's get down to it about why *I* posted what I did. He said "He beat the 4-3 Jets and played very well while doing so." I simply replied the Defense did most of the work that game. They did in my opinion. He contributed but the defense was the star of that game. With 3 interceptions, 1 forced fumble, and causing them to go three and out 5 times, the Defense owned them. How many times did Prescott make it into the Endzone? How many 3 and outs did he have? How many times did they settle for field goals over TD's? He had a decent game. He did well enough. He didn't "beat them" as if he was the reason the Cowboys won.
Now, his reply to my saying the defense did most of the work was claiming I moved goalposts. I did nothing of the sort because I was only refuting one thing in his post. So I replied to his claim that I was moving goalposts, not continuing the discussion of the Jets game. I explained that I was a fan of Dak. I was. I explained what caused me to shift from being a fan to not believing in him. I think he's a choker when it mattes and posted why. Nothing more, nothing less. So kindly take your false allegations and go elsewhere. I'm done with you.
