Jstopper
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,488
- Reaction score
- 8,007
It’s one flipping win after 3 losses. People literally go dumb and lose their minds
what does that have to do with him getting credit?
It’s one flipping win after 3 losses. People literally go dumb and lose their minds
I don’t think the OP or Broaddus was saying it did.He gets some credit for today's win. Now tell me how today's good win outweighs 9 years of mediocrity?
I don’t think the OP or Broaddus was saying it did.
It’s one good win. Even if you give Garrett credit for today’s win, the rest of this miserable season overshadows it x1000000. Compound that x10 years, yeah... today doesn’t change my mind on Garrett whatsoever
Why hate? Why can’t some people just accept he isn’t the right man for the job instead of creating a personal grudge in their mind? Garrett isn’t intentionally trying to lose games or acting out of spite or malice. The decision to let him go should have nothing to do with emotion or some imagined personal affront. It should be a calm, level headed, unemotional and we’ll considered decision based on what will help the team get better.Yep, I do hate Garrett, its not blind either, I can promise you that
I'm more angry with him after this win because all I see is lost potential this year.
thats all Broaddus and the OP were saying as well. Neither suggested this win wiped the slate clean.& I’m not saying he shouldn’t get some credit for today. He should. But we’re 7-7. He’s won nothing in 9 years. Anything short of a Super Bowl and he has to go. His hot seat shouldn’t be any less hot because of one game
I'm not the one that has to make that decision, I'm a fan, fans are ALL about emotions, it's what makes us fans.....we love, hate, sometimes st the same time, but that emotional drug is why we keep on coming back.Why hate? Why can’t some people just accept he isn’t the right man for the job instead of creating a personal grudge in their mind? Garrett isn’t intentionally trying to lose games or acting out of spite or malice. The decision to let him go should have nothing to do with emotion or some imagined personal affront. It should be a level headed, unemotional decision based on what will help the team get better.
Irrational emotion and illogical thoughts aren’t requirements for fandom. Neither are fabricated grudges and imagined personal affronts.I'm not the one that has to make that decision, I'm a fan, fans are ALL about emotions, it's what makes us fans.....we love, hate, sometimes st the same time, but that emotional drug is why we keep on coming back.
This!He gets some credit for today's win. Now tell me how today's good win outweighs 9 years of mediocrity?
Bryan broaddus on the postgame show made an excellent point. He said if you can blame the head coach for every loss but after every win it’s because of the players then you clearly are speaking from blind hatred of the head coach. By no means am I a fan of Garrett but some of y’all are looking like clowns with your takes on him
I'm more angry with him after this win because all I see is lost potential this year.
The real clowns are the ones who come to conclusions after 1 game instead of considering both the season and the body of work.Bryan broaddus on the postgame show made an excellent point. He said if you can blame the head coach for every loss but after every win it’s because of the players then you clearly are speaking from blind hatred of the head coach. By no means am I a fan of Garrett but some of y’all are looking like clowns with your takes on him
Your opinion is completely invalid then if you cannot set aside the hate to have fair analysis
Romo called audibles at the line of scrimmage just like other QBs.Many people think that some of those years were despite of garrett. For instance romo calling his own plays. Is the notion of the talent overcoming bad coaching completely out of the realm of possibilities?