SupermanXx
Benched
- Messages
- 4,009
- Reaction score
- 0
well there you have it boys.... blindzebra : bobby carpenter :: pittdawg : rob pettiti
theogt;1601504 said:I watched it. Several times. I wasn't as excited about his play as some here. It was fine play, but I'm not sure it was any better than Carpenter necessarily.
AtlCB;1601492 said:Where is the hypocrisy?
blindzebra;1601516 said:Where isn't it, is a better question.
THUMPER;1601495 said:There is a world of difference between the #18 (Carpenter) pick and the #42 (Burnett). They are NEARLY a round apart (#42 was the 10th pick in the 2nd round).
If you don't think so, then take a look at the value difference: 900 for #18, 480 for #42, NEARLY double.
THUMPER;1601534 said:I don't believe it is hypocrisy. People have higher expectations of a 1st rounder than they do of a 2nd round pick. Your first pick should be a player and a starter. Spender was taken later than Carpenter yet he would be pushing Ellis for the starting job if Greg were healthy. As it is he will be the starter on Day-1 and Ellis is likely to be the guy coming in off the bench.
That's what you expect from a 1st round pick.
2nd rounders are not expected to start right away but they are expected to contribute. Burnett was hurt and had a tough time getting out of Parcells' doghouse. I also think he was misused some. He looks much more comfortable in Phillips' defense as it relies more on speed than on bulk, he seems better suited to it than to Parcells' 3-4.
THUMPER;1601495 said:There is a world of difference between the #18 (Carpenter) pick and the #42 (Burnett). They are NEARLY a round apart (#42 was the 10th pick in the 2nd round).
If you don't think so, then take a look at the value difference: 900 for #18, 480 for #42, NEARLY double.
theogt;1601416 said:If he'd been put inside immediately we wouldn't have signed Ayodele and Burnett would be starting right now. Parcells mistakenly believed he was an OLB. Nevermind that he doesn't have the body type at all for a 3-4 OLB.
If you are going to make the claim, you should give examples. You need to come up with examples of posters specifically saying Carp is a bust and Burnett isn't or vice versa without the poster giving some kind of good explanation.blindzebra;1601516 said:Where isn't it, is a better question.
Chocolate Lab;1601570 said:I pretty much get what you're saying, BZ... Burnett seems like he's escaped some scrutiny.
But... Besides being a lower pick, I think Burnett benefits from one thing: I'm not sure Parells even wanted him to start with. I still scratch my head at why we'd even draft a converted safety whose game is speed and quickness and struggled to stay at 235 lbs, when that is exactly the opposite of what Parcells wanted in a linebacker. Did Lacewell activate the chip he'd implanted in Jerry's brain? Did we want strictly a cover/nickel LB? I dunno.
But I almost can't blame the player for not playing in a system that didn't suit him from the start. Carpenter, on the other hand, we know all the Parcells connections. So it seems more like Bobby just wasn't good enough.
And again... I like both players. Just offering some ideas on why people see them differently. I still think it's mostly that one was a first rounder and one a second. Plus, Ware is so good that he could almost save that draft almost by himself.
AtlCB;1601602 said:If you are going to make the claim, you should give examples. You need to come up with examples of posters specifically saying Carp is a bust and Burnett isn't or vice versa without the poster giving some kind of good explanation.
blindzebra;1601620 said:Their story-lines and careers are too similar at this point for them not to be connected...therefore, if a poster is calling one a bust, but not the other, they are doing it for reasons other than the reality of the situation...IOW, it's an agenda.
IMO, it screams hypocrisy.
blindzebra;1601612 said:So Parcells would draft a guy in the first round, go against Jerry and the scouts, just because his dad played for him?
Parcells had his faults, but stupid sentimentality over his legacy wasn't one of them.
If that is the best they can come up with, they are wackier than I thought.:laugh2:
AtlCB;1601602 said:If you are going to make the claim, you should give examples. You need to come up with examples of posters specifically saying Carp is a bust and Burnett isn't or vice versa without the poster giving some kind of good explanation.