Toruk_Makto
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,242
- Reaction score
- 17,336
Martin has short arms and is an elite RG. We shouldn't (and likely won't) consider moving him.
I think that might get considered. Tackle is a more premium position.
I do think the Cowboys like martin lined up next to Frederick. It virtually ensures a zone to run behind. (which we sometimes under-utilize)
This is off the top of my head so I might be misremembering it. But I think we ran best over Martin and Free which should surprise a lot of people. Somebody check me on it. I don't get PFF individual stats anymore.
Collins played some RT in OTA's when he first came to Dallas and was terrible, struggled with his footwork and technique.
He was quickly moved to LG where he has stayed the last two years, he has never played RT in college or in an NFL game.
Prior to the draft, scouts looked at him as a possible swing tackle but Brugler and others viewed him ideally suited for G in the NFL and based on what the Cowboys have done with him accordingly, he is right.
I think the question is not can he play RT but rather should he attempt to play any RT since he is better suited at playing G in the NFL.
Free agency and the draft can add to the RT position depth with players who are ideally suited to play the RT position.
While this is a poor draft for left tackles there should be lots of guys falling that would be great right tackles
If there's a good one there halfway through the second I'd move up and grab him
How does spending one draft pick on a second round tackle preclude you from spending a ton of picks and resources on your defenseTrade up for an OLman? No thanks. We already have two big-money OLmen with at least one more on the way. You can only devote so many resources to one positional group. Unless a can't miss RT falls to us, I don't see how we would go with RT over bigger needs. We've already had a dominant OL the past 3 years and we've failed every time because of weaknesses in other areas.
Agreed. If one falls to us then great. Not trading up early for one. Especially in a draft that is deep in defensive playmakers and short on quality OT'S.Trade up for an OLman? No thanks. We already have two big-money OLmen with at least one more on the way. You can only devote so many resources to one positional group. Unless a can't miss RT falls to us, I don't see how we would go with RT over bigger needs. We've already had a dominant OL the past 3 years and we've failed every time because of weaknesses in other areas.
As crazy as it sounds, it might be Martin at RT someday.
I put this right with your take of his college ability.
They gave him a week there and decided to give him a shot at guard as a rookie. The stuff about footwork and technique is just more garbage you made up.
Brugler did not say that. Brugler said that he could play either. Shall we revisit the actual quotes again? This time you should try being intellectually honest and posting everything he wrote on the matter and not just what you want to read.
Sure he can play RT. I don't think he will be as dominant at RT as he would at LG. It's a Question you have to ask yourself. Would you rather have another pro bowl Guard or an above average at best RT? His technique is not great and he gets by on his great athleticism. Posters on here was complaining about his Pass protection at guard where it's much easier to hide players with lack of pass protection ability (between arguably the best LT and Center at that). How quickly are yall gonna turn on him at RT when teams swith their top edge rusher onto the strong side and he allows a sack and a few QB hits each game?
It not just gives him a better chance of success in the NFL but which is more likely to help the team. Someone dominating at guard or someone just good enough to beat out our other options currently on the team. Between Free, Green, Cleary, and possibly another OT taken in the draft, we will have enough to patch up RT for a year. Now thats of course a OT doesn't fall into our laps early in this years draft. But some teams have to patch their entire O line with Doug Frees and Emmit Clearys. I honestly think 2018 draft would be the perfect time to invest a premium pick on a OT if don't do that this year. Its a much deeper OT class then this years.Yes, the question is less about can he play or "survive" at RT but rather which position is he better suited for and provides him with the best chance for success as a player given his strengths and weaknesses, obviously it is LG.
It not just gives him a better chance of success in the NFL but which is more likely to help the team. Someone dominating at guard or someone just good enough to beat out our other options currently on the team. Between Free, Green, Cleary, and possibly another OT taken in the draft, we will have enough to patch up RT for a year. Now thats of course a OT doesn't fall into our laps early in this years draft. But some teams have to patch their entire O line with Doug Frees and Emmit Clearys. I honestly think 2018 draft would be the perfect time to invest a premium pick on a OT if don't do that this year. Its a much deeper OT class then this years.