I don't understand this perspective, personally. even if it is true, so what? lamb was already a great #2 so he 'may' not make the leap w/ amari still here, but their combined performances highly outweigh ceedee as the man and whoever his also ran counterpart is. i'd much rather have them both for defenses to deal with, even if one is slightly suppressed.
Up and down like a roller coaster........now let's see a performance this week. Consistency and scheme make a world of difference for the elite.
Well next week one side will be silenced and the other won't shut up that's for sure, Dak apologists vs haters.
Generally you are. Now? No.
I have not referred to your posts as rule violations, or proclaimed my victory over someone else’s opinion. This is a place for football talk, none of that is football talk.
Then talk football.
He is #1 on this team, is he on other teams thats debatable. Is he better than Cooper yes is he better than AJ Brown or Hill or Diggs NO. but he's in discussion. i've watched him disappear in games like others. the reason Irvin was the man was his consistency. the reason Dez was the man was his consistency. all the good ones are consistent and make contested catches. not saying CeeDee does not do these things just not all the time.
True....but my eyes aren't going to be fixated on just Dak, next week. There will be many areas to examine than to merely take an easy route of blame or praise versus excuses and immunity for others. Not gonna happen from me. And as you write.... this is not a Dak thread.
And that statline, until proven otherwise, is still his greatest season he’s ever had. Every player is going to get more stats if they’re thrown the ball more. That doesn’t make a player a #1 based off of the increase in involvement/stats. CeeDee is a better player than he was his rookie year, or he was in the season where was doing whatever he was doing. Amari also isn’t a true #1, so that created another issue for Dallas at the time.
Cooper took us as far as he could. He showed he does not show up in big games or on the road. Cooper at 20 plus million allowed us to add pieces like Cooks and Gilmore later on….Gallup to but that didn’t work out in our favor.
that's like saying everyone on the team has taken us as far as they can. on his worst day he elevates our current corps and that's what's important. his contract or lack there of have zero to do w/ acquiring cooks or gilmore. choosing gallup and schulz over him was a mistake.
It does. This team does not trade for Cooks or Gilmore with Cooper here.
they don't need cooks with him here. and yes, they'd still trade for gilmore, that doesn't even make sense. if you just want to say you wanted to move on from him because he didn't live up to the expectations, that's fine. he's better than anything we've had since, and made a nice pairing with ceedee though, and we'd be a more complete offense with him here today.
This is a fabrication.
Those were efficiency stats, not usuage stats (referring to rating while targeted, and drop %)
