big dog cowboy;2150988 said:It's takes more than a phone call to qualify as serious........
JJ: I just want to call you today and ask about
Mike Brown: He isn't available. We are not trading Chad.
JJ: OK nevermind.
YoMick;2151015 said:Where players go to un-officially end their careers.
http://i17.***BLOCKED***/albums/b60/timmyab1/Guiness-Brilliant.jpg
Yikes, that puts it into perspective.cobra;2150893 said:He isn't 30, Quincy.
He will be 34 in one month.
Let's put it this way:
Would you give up a 2nd round pick next year and a 6th round pick in 2010 for Greg Ellis?
Greg Ellis had more sacks in 3 less games last year. And Greg Ellis is one year younger then Jason Taylor. He also has 1 less year of wear and tear on his body.
So would you give that up for Ellis right now? I wouldn't.
skinsngibbs4life;2151001 said:Our D was 10th in the league last year without Taylor and with a horrible pass rush. How are we that far away from a good defense?
skinsngibbs4life;2151012 said:Now, Im not saying this makes the skins a contender in the least. However, how can you say he is on the downside of his career? He has posted double digit sacks in 5 of his last 6 seasons ( double digits in the last 3), he is still posting up multiple forced fumbles a year, and he hasnt missed a game in 8 seasons. Just wondering how he is "definatly on the downside of his career"
skinsngibbs4life;2151012 said:Now, Im not saying this makes the skins a contender in the least. However, how can you say he is on the downside of his career? He has posted double digit sacks in 5 of his last 6 seasons ( double digits in the last 3), he is still posting up multiple forced fumbles a year, and he hasnt missed a game in 8 seasons. Just wondering how he is "definatly on the downside of his career"
mbanx;2151020 said:How do trades like this work do the skins just absord his current contract or do they need to sweeten the pot for Taylor? Even though I hate the fact that the skins got Taylor it has made for some good banter. If this were to happen to the Cowboys we have so much depth that I don't think we would have considered this kind of a move. I really don't think this trade does anything more than make Parcells and Taylor happy to part ways.
Dude, yardbarker is considered so bad we don't allow any of their crap to be posted on this web site any more. That tells me all I need to know.Bob Sacamano;2150995 said:
skinsngibbs4life;2151001 said:Our D was 10th in the league last year without Taylor and with a horrible pass rush. How are we that far away from a good defense?
Getting rebuffed when asking about any players availablity isn't considered making a "serious run" at a player.Bob Sacamano;2151019 said:so getting rebuffed means we aren't serious...ok
Tra_Col99;2150997 said:Does Taylor help the Commanders this year? Yes. All you have to do is look at who he is replacing and what they needed. However, saying that, this was a dumb move for them. Taylor has stated that he might only play one more year. Is a 2nd and a 6th worth it to get a little better for 1 year? A year in which you aren't even a contender for a Superbowl? No.
Look at the age of the Skins' lines. This helps them this year but puts them further behind in what they really need to do, and that is to get younger on both lines.
This is Snyders way of milking money out of idiot Commanders fans. This makes them buy jersey's, sell out games...nothing more. This is Snyder being Snyder, period.