I dont even know what to make of this post its everywhere? THe OPPR hasnt been in the top half of the league since 2007. Carr has provided basically nothing but an expensive warm body.
I dont even know if you are being serious to say we are lucky to have a warm body and should be thankful all it cost was $50M. The Mo pick was solidifying our first in the stupid sweepstakes. The ROI on that offseason is completely negative and has contributed mightily to killing valuable Romo years.
No GM in the league would have survived that 2012 offseason.
Yes. Look just at the OPPR.
We all know that playing DB is strictly a one-on-one thing. Nothing happening on the defense (or the offense for that matter) makes a difference in that.
Some of you folks and your fantasy statistics. You've got the fantasy #s but not any sort of real statistical understanding of what they mean.
Right....so address nothing and support everything the team does. how do you think that $50M investment (+ Mo) worked out? If you ran a project at work that invested $60-$70M and got sub industry mean returns, how would that pan out. So far your response is "Warm body, he's there, Im thankful." And, while it is something - it is kind of embarrassing.
If he is cut June 1, I cant wait for the "He was an expensive warm body" good thing he is cut wasnt worth the money.
Everything is boiled down to market clearing prices. Carr is fine as a #2 at 3-4M per year. He isnt that. So he accounts for below investment returns.
Think of it this way - you bought stock A at $1000 4 years ago and it has returned between -0.05 and + 0.05% per year. You consider to hold it because "hey -I already own it"
Are you going on record that if he were cut last year or this year he would have been paid >$10M per year by another team looking for a CB with a pulse?
And you could have sold it 2 years ago and recouped 50% of your loss.
But you didn't because you couldn't decide on any other stock in the world to invest in.
Like right tackle.
Like right tackle.
There's not really a such thing as a "great tackler" at cornerback in the NFL.
Carr absolutely has to take a pay cut or be released, it's a matter of principle at this point.
If he's playing on his full salary and so is Church, our front office is, for the lack of a better term, really stupid.
The fat lady hasn't sung yet but having the songbird Broaddus come out and speak about how totally important Carr is to this defense is funny. He's an average CB who stays healthy. He's a good guy in the community but he's not some crazy talented CB that is essential for any defense.
This is a perfect summation of Carr's situation. But it appears some posters have taken his salary personally.
I would gladly accept a number of offensive tackles in this draft. Starting with Tunsil.
Right....so address nothing and support everything the team does. how do you think that $50M investment (+ Mo) worked out? If you ran a project at work that invested $60-$70M and got sub industry mean returns, how would that pan out. So far your response is "Warm body, he's there, Im thankful." And, while it is something - it is kind of embarrassing.
If he is cut June 1, I cant wait for the "He was an expensive warm body. good thing he is cut -wasnt worth the money."
Everything is boiled down to market clearing prices. Carr is fine as a #2 at 3-4M per year. He isnt that. So he accounts for below investment returns.
Think of it this way - you bought stock A at $1000 4 years ago and it has returned between -0.05 and + 0.05% per year. You consider to hold it because "hey -I already own it"
Are you going on record that if he were cut last year or this year he would have been paid >$10M per year by another team looking for a CB with a pulse?
Ok good enough tackler. And there are teams that have DBs who can tackle and their defense benefits greatly from it. A great coach once said that football was essentially a game of blocking and tackling. A bit simple but I get the concept.
Seattle integrates their CBs into the run game as an essential ingredient. I use them as a successful agent of the concept which is really as old as the game. It's nothing really ingenious other than teams compromised in the attempt to get shutdown corners who were too fragile to cover and tackle without getting hurt.....ie Deion.
Hence my insistence we change our angle of acquisition to DBs who are long and physical and can tackle as well as cover. Those guys do exist and they generally aren't found in the first rounds although that is changing. Jones is an example of a guy who can tackle and cover and has the length and physicality to go with it.
NY had no problems making Cruz take a pay cut but we can't with Carr? Might as well let the inmates run the asylum
Looks like we've reached the point of the offseason where the sales job starts all over again.
They couldn't get a replacement, so now Carr's "not that bad"
They missed out on several free agents but now the Chief Snake Oil Salesman wants to talk about "the numbers" we now have, as if all has gone according to their master plan.
People can decide for themselves whether they want to buy it or not.