xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,059
- Reaction score
- 64,524
Matt Johnson was cut last week
Yes, that should have been Jemea Thomas.
Matt Johnson was cut last week
How many Playoff wins have the Cowboys had since 96? The ranting by the fans is totally understandable in 2014.
It's not so much that Clutts made the team, it's that we're going with a FB over a guy with talent like Williams. I know people are divided about whether FB is still a position of need in this league, but regardless.... this team can't tell me that Clutts is more valuable than Williams.
Dude.... that's not the issue. They were keeping a FB no matter what. The issue is between between Randle and Williams and they didn't think there was that much difference too justify the loss on special teams. Williams was never going to see the field and is definately NOT better than Randle on special teams. Good grief!
Bluestang had a perfectly formatted Final 53, now it's merged to post #148. It really should be at the top of a thread, IMO.
Start complaining when the player you cover becomes something other than a camp body. Danny Ammendola is one of the only recent roster cuts downs that people have rued that became something. Cutting your 4th RB is not going to cost you the Super Bowl.
I get a kick out of people who complain about the guys who were cut like they were going to be pro bowlers this year. I wish they would've kept Williams but its not like he's a no brainer. Can't stay healthy (hurt now) and is a one dimensional running back.
Start complaining when the player you cover becomes something other than a camp body. Danny Ammendola is one of the only recent roster cuts downs that people have rued that became something. Cutting your 4th RB is not going to cost you the Super Bowl.
Williams has never shown the ability to start. He cant stay on the field and when hes on the field he isnt good.
Dunbar has never impressed me and is more injury prone than Murray..........
Nor is Joseph Randle going to be a difference in winning or losing either.
W
Who talking Super Bowl? At this point I'll just settle for 10 wins and a playoff victory.
But he did look good against first stringers, San Diego's first team in particular, while Williams look good against scrubs. Randle plays special teams and does it well, Williams doesn't. So I'd say that Randle provides more of a difference between winning and losing than Williams would.
You think that your 4th RB who wouldn't dress on game day would push you over the top.
I get it, you like Williams, he looked good against 3rd stringers but Randle has looked good too and he's a good special teamer. It's a no brainer. I'd be more pissed about Dunbar making the team over Williams.
one thing fans tend to forget is the pre season games are only a small part of the evaluation process. the practices are a huge part
It was not a fair competition. If it was, we would have seen Williams in the same situations and opportunities that Randle had.
There was a pecking order that was obviously immune to change no matter what.
Williams did what it takes to make a football team except be a draft choice.