FiveTime
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 687
- Reaction score
- 662
BREAKING NEWS: Hardy's suspension was extended 10 games for appealing Goodell's decision!
That!...was funny!
BREAKING NEWS: Hardy's suspension was extended 10 games for appealing Goodell's decision!
Where did you hear he retired?
Where did you hear he retired?
Here it is:
If Brady does sue, Kessler will have a much more difficult time beating the NFL this time around. One reason is because a judge that has been favorable to Kessler and the union, David Doty, is no longer hearing cases. Also, the Peterson case being overturned was the legal equivalent of Halley's Comet, as several legal expertsexplained to Ben Volin of the Boston Globe.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2464433-meet-tom-bradys-lawyer-nfl-archenemy-jeffrey-kessler
Here it is:
If Brady does sue, Kessler will have a much more difficult time beating the NFL this time around. One reason is because a judge that has been favorable to Kessler and the union, David Doty, is no longer hearing cases. Also, the Peterson case being overturned was the legal equivalent of Halley's Comet, as several legal expertsexplained to Ben Volin of the Boston Globe.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2464433-meet-tom-bradys-lawyer-nfl-archenemy-jeffrey-kessler
Hardly Halley's comet. It was a pretty clear cut case.
And the rumors of him not hearing cases have come about many times. It could be the case now, but I'd like him to cite his source on that.
i can't believe we're happy for a 2 game suspension for a player who was not found legally guilty of anything at all.
Neither was oj but most can agree he was guilty
lol...murder, really?
Neither was oj but most can agree he was guilty
Point being just because someone is not found guilty doesn't mean they're not guilty.
BREAKING NEWS: Hardy's suspension was extended 10 games for appealing Goodell's decision!
That's exactly what it means. I think what you were trying to say is that just because someone is found not guilty doesn't mean they're innocent.
Point being just because someone is not found guilty doesn't mean they're not guilty.
That's fair, but the other side of that discussion is that it doesn't prove they are either.
True. Everyone has difference of opionons on the evidence. No different than a jury does. I think he did it. Others don't.
I don't know if he did "It" or not. I am not even sure what "It" really is. I think nobody knows enough about the details to say for sure what exactly transpired there.