Twitter: Cowboys deemed cheap spenders by NFLPA

[TheMarathonContinues]

You can look at all of our bad contracts and understand the problem real quick. We're not cheap.. We're stupid.

Who would you have not signed at the time? I’ll assume Zeke....who else?

 

[JustChip]

Damn. Even the clowns of the NFLPA are calling our front office cheap.....smh.

Yeah, along with those pitiful, unaccomplished Chiefs and Patriots. The NFLPA’s priorities are not about winning; they’re about maximizing player income.

 

[big dog cowboy]

Cowboys deemed cheap spenders by NFLPA

 

[Killerinstinct]

Jerry parked in a handicapped spot and once stiffed a waitress with 2 kids.

 

[Bullflop]

Of course the NFLPA is going to back one of their players!

When push come so shove, that's what they're there for.
They certainly don't exist to cater to the owners!

Is "cheap" actually a fair claim? Well, it just depends.

The Owners Association may not think so, though!

 

[CATCH17]

Who would you have not signed at the time? I’ll assume Zeke....who else?

You sign guys mostly for what they can do going forward and just use the past as what they are capable of.

Maybe they projected them to be better.. Or.. Players are just looking for a pay day from the Jones’s and once they get it they mail it in because that’s the real Super Bowl around here.

 

[cowboyblue22]

We like our guys and apparently our results.

yes they are happy with their guys and the results pitiful is so sad to see what the once proud dallas cowboys franchise has turned into

 

[SlammedZero]

Interesting the other two low spending teams have been/won Super Bowls recently.

 

[Dre11]

You sign guys mostly for what they can do going forward and just use the past as what they are capable of.

Maybe they projected them to be better.. Or.. Players are just looking for a pay day from the Jones’s and once they get it they mail it in because that’s the real Super Bowl around here.

Please tell me how you determine or guarantee what a player will do going forward? Considering you can't see the future means you're always taking a shot in the dark or risk. It's no different with Dak. You pay based on what you saw someone do or is capable of, the only way you know what someone is CAPABLE of is by what you've seen them do in the past

 

[CATCH17]

Please tell me how you determine or guarantee what a player will do going forward? Considering you can't see the future means you're always taking a shot in the dark or risk. It's no different with Dak. You pay based on what you saw someone do or is capable of, the only way you know what someone is CAPABLE of is by what you've seen them do in the past

There is a million different ways to project..

Injury history, age, attitude, 1 year wonder, ect..

 

[ryanbabs]

Jerry has to pay for that yahct...

 

[dagreat1_87]

"So in terms of the narrative that they will use the money they could potentially save by not caving into Prescott’s demands on building the team around him, the proof has not been in the pudding. And if they didn’t do all they could do to build the team around Prescott when he was the best bargain in sports what gives you any hope they will use the money for significant outside reinforcements now. Why would Prescott believe that’s going to be case?"

This point right here is why I don't blame Dak for getting as much as he can from the Jones'. He ends up taking less just so they can give 35 mil guaranteed to Xavier Woods lol

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

You sign guys mostly for what they can do going forward and just use the past as what they are capable of.

Maybe they projected them to be better.. Or.. Players are just looking for a pay day from the Jones’s and once they get it they mail it in because that’s the real Super Bowl around here.

I'm asking though what signings made them stupid?

I think we can argue they were stupid for drafting Zeke or any running back as early as they did....but once they traded for Amari and drafted Zeke.....you had to re-sign those guys. I can't call them stupid for the guys they signed because when they signed them they were good players and they looked promising going forward.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Jerry has to pay for that yahct...

Basically. Fans want Dak to play GM and take less just so they can just give that money to Xavier Woods, Chido, etc.

 

[baltcowboy]

Damn. Even the clowns of the NFLPA are calling our front office cheap.....smh.

It’s business brother, Dak should ask for the moon and the Joneses have the right to say no.

 

[cowboyblue22]

they are right son and jerry are cheap and down right dumb

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Yeah, along with those pitiful, unaccomplished Chiefs and Patriots. The NFLPA’s priorities are not about winning; they’re about maximizing player income.

You know I'd say that but then I look at the contracts of these players and how they aren't guaranteed......they are going about it foolishly.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

It’s business brother, Dak should ask for the moon and the Joneses have the right to say no.

You are correct. But they are trying to reinvent the wheel here and they are failing doing so.

 

[dogunwo]

Not really fair overall.

They typically over pay for their own.

They just refuse to sign decent free agents from other teams.

And you have guys like Mickey Spagnola always parrot "If he's so good, why's he available?" As if the way the Jones boys have been doing it has been so successful.

 

[Denim Chicken]

That's no excuse to lock ourselves into mediocrity with Daks contract.