Cowboys' defense could use some "Law" and order

JIGGYFLY said:
Yes he was thats the point. Would you give up 10 ints for 10 tds or 0 td's and 4 int's.

Show me that is the case. He got burned for as many TD's? I dont believe it...
 
Its Jerrys Job to get the best talent... Big Bills job to make that talent win! I would love to see Ty LAW a Cowboy and say its BIG BILLs job to make it work but then again I'm a fan... But I alos think coaches like those kind of problems!!!

last year the Cowboys D started out with NEWMAN in the slot... old man GLENN allowed that! do u wanna make a SUPER BOWL run depending on Aaron Glenn? what if GLENN shows his age... then what? Nate Jones?


this is either a SUPER BOWL run or it is not!
 
Reality said:
For the last time, the ONLY way Law is coming to Dallas is if he willing to play free safety or either Newman or Henry go down with an injury. With Aaron Glenn providing a solid backup cornerback and Jacques Reeves working on special teams and as the fourth cornerback, there is no room on this team for another cornerback.

Law had a great season last year at cornerback and has no reason at this point to move to safety so the only way this will happen is if no other team signs him prior to training camp starting and Law realizing that either he plays safety or doesn't play unless a team loses a starting cornerback for the season.


Don't bother my friend. Some Cowboys fans are like a wall. Like I've stated in the past, I talk to Ty Law from time to time and he already told me what he thinks about playing safety and I've relayed the information to this board. But they would rather listen to a no name writer's opinion and to be honest, that article was awful and anyone who knows Ty Law would think the same. You think Law gives a damn about being reunited with Bill Parcells? He could care less. He's going to the highest bidder so unless Dallas is ready to anti up some big money, you can forget about it until another fan site with no sources prints a story saying Ty Law is coming to Dallas based on nothing more than pure speculation. I'm like 5-1 on here with my info and this is the surest I've been out of any of them. Ty Law is not coming to Dallas. Please, I know it's the offseason and you have nothing to do but I'm begging you all, move on from this. It's not going to happen.
 
YoMick said:
So give the ball back to the other team them. Its not fair. They tried to get it past Law and even though he was washed up he still pulled it in.


Uh, I will take 10 INTs I dont care why or how he gets a hold of them. Was he serverely burned on alot of plays last year? anyone know?

I think he was second in the NFL in pass interference penalties. I know he was first late in the year with something like 13 but I'm pretty sure someone passed him in the final two weeks because Law didn't play as much due to his foot giving him problems.
 
Bledsoe4MVP said:
Not true, there were reports last month talking about Belichik and the Pats potentially being interested in bringing Law back into the fold for the right price.

Mangini is the new coach of the jets and I'm sure he would have kept him if they weren't in salary cap hell.

I'm also pretty sure I saw that the dolphins were mentioned as showing interest at some point too since they are in the AFC East and very familir with Law and what he's capable of doing.

:cool:

:rolleyes:

There has been nothing but internet speculation on the Law going back to the Pats. Have they talked to him? Brought him in? He's available right now.

Fins went another direction. I think the interest was more on Law's part than on the Fins part.

Mangini made no effort to bring him back.

Crennel didn't even look at him.

Like I said, if he was all world, I think his former coaches would be scrambling to sign him. Look how fast McGinest got scooped up and almost every coach off of that tree was trying to bring him in.
 
doomsday81 said:
Don't bother my friend. Some Cowboys fans are like a wall. Like I've stated in the past, I talk to Ty Law from time to time and he already told me what he thinks about playing safety and I've relayed the information to this board. But they would rather listen to a no name writer's opinion and to be honest, that article was awful and anyone who knows Ty Law would think the same. You think Law gives a damn about being reunited with Bill Parcells? He could care less. He's going to the highest bidder so unless Dallas is ready to anti up some big money, you can forget about it until another fan site with no sources prints a story saying Ty Law is coming to Dallas based on nothing more than pure speculation. I'm like 5-1 on here with my info and this is the surest I've been out of any of them. Ty Law is not coming to Dallas. Please, I know it's the offseason and you have nothing to do but I'm begging you all, move on from this. It's not going to happen.
I want to frame and sticky this.
 
junk said:
:rolleyes:

There has been nothing but internet speculation on the Law going back to the Pats. Have they talked to him? Brought him in? He's available right now.

Fins went another direction. I think the interest was more on Law's part than on the Fins part.

Mangini made no effort to bring him back.

Crennel didn't even look at him.

Like I said, if he was all world, I think his former coaches would be scrambling to sign him. Look how fast McGinest got scooped up and almost every coach off of that tree was trying to bring him in.

3 superbowl rings and 10 int's is more than all world, it's superstar status....in fact I remember in the AFC Championship a few years ago between the Pats and Colts, it was Ty Law that single handedly won the game picking off Manning 3 times.

The only reason he hasn't been signed yet is because he's looking for $7+ million a season and a $10M signing bonus...once he realizes he's likely not going to get that and his asking price decreases significantly I can guarantee half of the league (including all his former coaches) will be looking to get him, especially if their needs aren't addressed in the draft in a few weeks. :cool:
 
Bledsoe4MVP said:
in fact I remember in the AFC Championship a few years ago between the Pats and Colts, it was Ty Law that single handedly won the game picking off Manning 3 times.

Heh, I remember that too. I also remember that because of Law's patented mugging of receivers, they tightened up the calls on defensive holding. Subsequently, your golden boy racks up Pass Interference calls and defensive holding calls like they're going out of style. He doesn't have the athleticism to consistently run with WRs anymore.

He's obviously got a nose for the football, and at FS, I'd say lets do it for minimal dollars. But Law isn't palying FS, and he's looking for big money. Incredibly, both of those points seem to continually escape your feeble grasp of the topic.

Actually, considering the source, it's not so incredible after all....
 
Bledsoe4MVP said:
3 superbowl rings and 10 int's is more than all world, it's superstar status....in fact I remember in the AFC Championship a few years ago between the Pats and Colts, it was Ty Law that single handedly won the game picking off Manning 3 times.

The only reason he hasn't been signed yet is because he's looking for $7+ million a season and a $10M signing bonus...once he realizes he's likely not going to get that and his asking price decreases significantly I can guarantee half of the league (including all his former coaches) will be looking to get him, especially if their needs aren't addressed in the draft in a few weeks. :cool:


Why didnt that happen last season then? he made a measly 3 million and had only 1 taker
 
BigDFan5 said:
Why didnt that happen last season then? he made a measly 3 million and had only 1 taker

He was coming of serious injuries after missing a big chunk of the 2004 season (including the playoffs) and was deemed as 'a risk' in the free agent market because of it. This is why the pats didn't resign him in the first place....they won another superbowl without him.

Also Law didn't have the leverage he did this offseason because that. No team was going to shell out top dollar for a veteran cornerback coming off serious injuries. Not only did he bounce back to stay healthy and play well last season, he had 10 picks and looked as dominant as ever and was one of the few bright spots on a hideous jets team.
 
BigDFan5 said:
Why didnt that happen last season then? he made a measly 3 million and had only 1 taker
I wonder why no one advocating Law can explain why this "superstar" doesn't have teams tripping over themselves to sign him?

Not one of these guys who has pimped him in this thread today has a plausible explanation why he's Free to sign anywhere 2 years in a row and scrambling to find a taker.

It isn't rocket surgery or brain science.
 
Hostile said:
I wonder why no one advocating Law can explain why this "superstar" doesn't have teams tripping over themselves to sign him?

Not one of these guys who has pimped him in this thread today has a plausible explanation why he's Free to sign anywhere 2 years in a row and scrambling to find a taker.

It isn't rocket surgery or brain science.

Please see the above response to bigdfan :abuseme:
 
Bledsoe4MVP said:
Please see the above response to bigdfan :abuseme:
Read it. Looks like a lot of spin control mumbo jumbo while ignoring the painful truth if you ask me. It only focuses on last year's injury as a reason.

10 INTs. Tied for the NFL lead.

Waived yet again, not many takers.

Is the fog clearing yet?
 
Hostile said:
I wonder why no one advocating Law can explain why this "superstar" doesn't have teams tripping over themselves to sign him?

Not one of these guys who has pimped him in this thread today has a plausible explanation why he's Free to sign anywhere 2 years in a row and scrambling to find a taker.

It isn't rocket surgery or brain science.

Because the only answer to that question hurts their argument
 
Charles said:
1st the media blurb doesn't carry any weight.

2nd.......Just because we haven't signed or drafted a player a client of Poston also doesn't carry any weight.

Do you know how many Sports agents that have never had clients (drafted or FA) with the Cowboys? What were the reason.......related to the Postons:lmao2:

But then again you are not on here saying we should sign those other free agents, you are talking about Ty Law.

You are making this way too easy.

3rd.....Ty Law isn't the only player we've had a chance to sign more than 3 times, I don't seem to remember anyone drawing a straight line to their Agent.

Once again we are not talking about other FAs, we are talking about Ty Law.




It's not a simple as you think. There could have been other higher priorities even though we were thin at CB, but while you aknowledge other reasons you're quick to mark the Postons the beast :laugh2:

So that is the reason we not only signed A.Henry but also A.Glenn at CB?
I mean we did'nt have a need and there were other priorities yet we still signed two CBs.
BTW those two CBs did not have Poston as their agent.

Seeing a trend here.

Reason to do it now. I like Law better than Aaron Glenn. He's an unpgrade after this season CB will be a priority. Glenn isn't getting any younger and we'll still need a 3rd CB capapble of starting. Law could then be moved to safety ala Rod Woodson.

We now have too much tied up in FA and the ONLY way Ty Law would come here is if he was coming cheaply. And it has already been made clear he is not signing somewhere cheaply.
But nothing wrong with wishing I guess.
What's that old saying about wishing in one hand :lmao:


If Jerry Jones wanted TO 2 season ago...........I doubt McNabb could convince the penny pinching Eagles to match any deal Jerry offered. We had no interest then, we do now, why can't same be said for Law..............Poston I guess:D

TO wanted to go to the Eagles, do you not think the Ravens or other teams would have given just as much if not more than the eagles?



I also leave you with this I know people who work in the sports management industry as agents closely. Postons while considered a mavericks are liked in the industry, because they push the envelope and get players better deals that eventually bleed over to other agents via the clients.

Postons and Rosenhaus are the new Scott Boras and Leigh Steinberger. If there ever was an owner in their mold it would be yours truly Jerry Jones and Danny boy.

I don't care if you know Jay and Silent bob, if Bill wanted Ty Law he would have signed Ty Law by now.

Histroy has nothing to do with it

Most people that ignore history, are doomed to repeat it, like you are seeminly doing now.:cool:



I am not stuck on the Postons. :laugh2:

Neither is bill and that is why he has not signed any of their clients.:D
 
doomsday81 said:
Don't bother my friend. Some Cowboys fans are like a wall. Like I've stated in the past, I talk to Ty Law from time to time and he already told me what he thinks about playing safety and I've relayed the information to this board. But they would rather listen to a no name writer's opinion and to be honest, that article was awful and anyone who knows Ty Law would think the same. You think Law gives a damn about being reunited with Bill Parcells? He could care less. He's going to the highest bidder so unless Dallas is ready to anti up some big money, you can forget about it until another fan site with no sources prints a story saying Ty Law is coming to Dallas based on nothing more than pure speculation. I'm like 5-1 on here with my info and this is the surest I've been out of any of them. Ty Law is not coming to Dallas. Please, I know it's the offseason and you have nothing to do but I'm begging you all, move on from this. It's not going to happen.
:bow: :bow: :bow:
 
Bledsoe4MVP said:
3 superbowl rings and 10 int's is more than all world, it's superstar status....in fact I remember in the AFC Championship a few years ago between the Pats and Colts, it was Ty Law that single handedly won the game picking off Manning 3 times.

The only reason he hasn't been signed yet is because he's looking for $7+ million a season and a $10M signing bonus...once he realizes he's likely not going to get that and his asking price decreases significantly I can guarantee half of the league (including all his former coaches) will be looking to get him, especially if their needs aren't addressed in the draft in a few weeks. :cool:

Well, lets just wait and see shall we? I'd be surprised if Saban, Parcells, Belichick or Crennel come knocking.
 
Hostile said:
Read it. Looks like a lot of spin control mumbo jumbo while ignoring the painful truth if you ask me. It only focuses on last year's injury as a reason.

10 INTs. Tied for the NFL lead.

Waived yet again, not many takers.

Is the fog clearing yet?

Law was waived because the Jets couldn't afford to keep him....so should we not have Signed Jason Fabini either because the same team released him? The Jet's had to clean house after a dissappointing season in which people thought they were going to be a superbowl team.

Law is worth $3-5 mil a year, nothing more at this point....and I want sign him immediately for that price to bolster our secondary and add true big play potential!

In fact speaking of teams that can't afford to keep elite players, I believe Drew Bledsoe was cut by the Bills because he refused to take a pay cut and back up that no good hippie Losman.

Money talks in this league....I just hope Drew doesn't demand a ridiculous contract after he has a monster season in 2006, because I'd hate to cut him after just 2 seasons. :(
 
Bledsoe4MVP said:
Law was waived because the Jets couldn't afford to keep him....so should we not have Signed Jason Fabini either because the same team released him? The Jet's had to clean house after a dissappointing season in which people thought they were going to be a superbowl team.
Good job missing the point. I wasn't talking about why he got released.

I'll repeat it for you one more time.

Why aren't teams tripping over themselves to sign a 10 INT CB?

Care to try again?

Law is worth $3-5 mil a year, nothing more at this point....and I want sign him immediately for that price to bolster our secondary and add true big play potential!
Here, let's measure how much what you want matters. Get a bucket. Fill it with water. Stick your hand in. Remove your hand. Look back at the water.

The hole left in the water is how much what you want matters.

I want Peyton Manning at QB. Guess what, same bucket...

In fact speaking of teams that can't afford to keep elite players, I believe Drew Bledsoe was cut by the Bills because he refused to take a pay cut and back up that no good hippie Losman.
I can only deal with one crush at a time. Keep Bledsoe on the back burner for this ride.

Money talks in this league....I just hope Drew doesn't demand a ridiculous contract after he has a monster season in 2006, because I'd hate to cut him after just 2 seasons. :(
More delusions, you won't be cutting him. The team would be.
 
Back
Top