CFZ Cowboys Do Not Need Dak

Blitzen

Blitzen

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,194
Reaction score
2,394
TheMarathonContinues said:
What results?
Click to expand...

Winning with a QB such as Cooper is proving that the team can beat other squads without Dak. Trying to say that Dak would produce better results is just bs. Now the goalposts are getting changed to Rush cannot beat non-trash teams because of his production (and the person arguing is saying that the opponent was trash when the Cowboys played them). If the squad loses to the Eagles with Rush, the argument will be that Dak would have won the game had he played. Will just hope the squad keeps winning and that whoever the QB is plays good football.
 
Dre11

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Slick said:
I do. He makes worse throws behind his receivers, and coughs up the ball more than Cooper has.
Click to expand...

Cooper is barely throwing the ball...lol you basing it on 5 games vs 6 years...wow just say you have no clue...lol
 
Calvin2Tony2Emmitt2Julius

Calvin2Tony2Emmitt2Julius

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,651
Reaction score
1,923
106 yds passing yeah we do . Coop is my dude

Dak is your qb. Reality is calling, pick up the phone

I've been letting you guys and your fantasy grow and grow.

But come on. Nobody with an ounce of football knowledge is sharing your fantasy!

Stop playing
 

Slick

Well-Known Member
Messages
882
Reaction score
742
Dre11 said:
You act like he turn the ball over at a high rate. Is int % is one of the best. We also don't know if there would be any ints if he's throwing the ball as few times Rush has. To add, these games probably aren't close either because they more than likely would be putting more points on the board.
Click to expand...
The probably excuse....... Are they winning, yes or no?

It's a 1 point win, still a win?
 
TheMarathonContinues

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
81,251
Reaction score
74,464
Blitzen said:
Winning with a QB such as Cooper is proving that the team can beat other squads without Dak. Trying to say that Dak would produce better results is just bs. Now the goalposts are getting changed to Rush cannot beat non-trash teams because of his production (and the person arguing is saying that the opponent was trash when the Cowboys played them). If the squad loses to the Eagles with Rush, the argument will be that Dak would have won the game had he played. Will just hope the squad keeps winning and that whoever the QB is plays good football.
Click to expand...
What on earth makes you think that the Cowboys would've lost if Dak had played the Commanders, Bengals, Giants and Rams? He's literally beaten 3 out of the 4 in recent memory.
 
Dre11

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Blitzen said:
Winning with a QB such as Cooper is proving that the team can beat other squads without Dak. Trying to say that Dak would produce better results is just bs. Now the goalposts are getting changed to Rush cannot beat non-trash teams because of his production (and the person arguing is saying that the opponent was trash when the Cowboys played them). If the squad loses to the Eagles with Rush, the argument will be that Dak would have won the game had he played. Will just hope the squad keeps winning and that whoever the QB is plays good football.
Click to expand...

It's not bs, based on how this defense is playing. And based on what Dak has shown over the 6 years, it's very easy to assume this team could be better . We have proof of it in 2016, and proof of it being the #1 offense last season .
 

Slick

Well-Known Member
Messages
882
Reaction score
742
Dre11 said:
Cooper is barely throwing the ball...lol you basing it on 5 games vs 6 years...wow just say you have no clue...lol
Click to expand...
The team has won all his games so far. I have no clue?

Dak has one playoff win in those 6 yrs. Nothing else matters, except in fantasy football. And I have no clue.
 
Northern_Cowboy

Northern_Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,227
Reaction score
3,816
TheMarathonContinues said:
He literally just went 4-0 in December last year lol. But ok lol.
Click to expand...

and then what happenned when it counted? And i know we played alot of great teams to end the season last year..Giants who won what 3 or 4 games last year a completly depleted Washington Commanders team (twice) and an Eagles team who didn't play any starters the last game of the season..we lost to the cardinals and beat the Saints..C'mon
 
Dre11

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Slick said:
The probably excuse....... Are they winning, yes or no?

It's a 1 point win, still a win?
Click to expand...

Don't change the subject, you asked a question, I answered it, it made you look stupid and now you want to go on to something else.
 
DandyDon1722

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,344
Reaction score
6,965
TheMarathonContinues said:
They don’t need Dak to beat trash. But when it’s time to score at least 20 points? They will need someone because it ain’t Rush.
Click to expand...

Agree, they will need someone and it's not Rush or Dak. Dak is ten games under .500 against winning teams.

I have a feeling while we wasted great offenses under Romo with bad defenses (remember the 48-45 loss to Denver) we will waste a great defense under both Dak and Rush.
 
Dre11

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Slick said:
The team has won all his games so far. I have no clue?

Dak has one playoff win in those 6 yrs. Nothing else matters, except in fantasy football. And I have no clue.
Click to expand...

The playoff record has absolutely nothing to do with what's happening now, and yes you have no clue, playoff wins is a team stat nor a qb stat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top