Cowboys showing some interest in Ridley

[CWR]

All the same cry babies were calling us 5-11 last year. Grow a pair and learn to wait and not rush to judgement. A free look at a guy with talent only 27 years old is not a bad thing. When we draft another rb everyone will settle down. Bunch of chicken littles.

 

[mldardy]

Anyone

His career stats clearly show he isnt

His career stats show he's had an 1000 yard season and a couple of seasons of 5+ ypc. So I would say you would need to be a good back to be better than that.

 

[XDez88BeastX]

Randle looked too good to just cut. Ill take him over Ridley..sorry bout it.

Dude is a turd, sorry bout it.

 

[darthseinfeld]

His career stats show he's had an 1000 yard season and a couple of seasons of 5+ ypc. So I would say you would need to be a good back to be better than that.

He had a 1,000 yard season 4 seasons ago and hasnt had more then 3.4 yards a carry the last 3 years. Hes done

 

[Bullflop]

You didn't fix anything and McFadden had more yards than that Murray guy. The guy had one breakout game(one breakout run in all honesty) and all of sudden he's some great back.

Guess you don't like to acknowledge that every run counts but actually, they all do.

 

[BAT]

Whoa, whoa, whoa. Just pump those brakes. We already guaranteed $200K to McFadden. Ridley would eat up another $200K, easily. We can't afford this kind of crazy spending people. We need to save it for ..... uh, old LBs and no name FBs?

 

[DallasDomination]

Unless it's Adrian Peterson don't come in here talking about Ridley..take that junk out of here.

 

[pacboyX]

Dude is a turd, sorry bout it.

Guess we will see how time plays out.

 

[SilverStarCowboy]

Everybody knows they're signing A.P.

My inside source says Dallas didn't clear 27 mil. for 2nd tiers.

 

[Wolf2k5]

Everybody knows they're signing A.P.

My inside source says Dallas didn't clear 27 mil. for 2nd tiers.

Thought they only had 8? Lol

 

[cowboyschmps3]

Stevan Ridley - RB - Free Agent
There appears to be mutual interest between the Cowboys and free agent RB Stevan Ridley.


Related: Cowboys

Source: Ben Volin on Twitter
Mar 13 - 9:57 AM

Think we still go at him?

 

[big dog cowboy]

Randle looked too good to just cut.

Yes he did.

 

[pacboyX]

All the same cry babies were calling us 5-11 last year. Grow a pair and learn to wait and not rush to judgement. A free look at a guy with talent only 27 years old is not a bad thing. When we draft another rb everyone will settle down. Bunch of chicken littles.

Id rather draft two cbs, than take a rb in first 4 rounds. How many good rbs will go undrafted. Let alone how many will get cut during training camp. Good defensive backs can be significantly more difficult to find.

 

[DTown214]

So are we still looking at Ridley after the McFadden signing?

 

[BAT]

So are we still looking at Ridley after the McFadden signing?

We need to counter Eagles 1-2 punch of Murray and Matthews.

 

[Wolf2k5]

We need to counter Eagles 1-2 punch of Murray and Matthews.

I just don't think panic signing rbs just because out div opponent did will give us any advantage

 

[BAT]

I just don't think panic signing rbs just because out div opponent did will give us any advantage

Comment was meant to be sarcastic.

 

[Wolf2k5]

Comment was meant to be sarcastic.

We really need a font for sarcasm. Lol I've just read many posts with worse suggestions than that that were very serious.

 

[Staubacher]

All the same cry babies were calling us 5-11 last year. Grow a pair and learn to wait and not rush to judgement. A free look at a guy with talent only 27 years old is not a bad thing. When we draft another rb everyone will settle down. Bunch of chicken littles.

I naively thought all the evidence of a successful season and consistently wise decisions by the organization would silence the chicken littles. But then they wouldn't be chicken littles, would they?

 

[CT Dal Fan]

We need to counter Eagles 1-2 punch of Murray and Matthews.

Is that any more or less dangerous than the McCoy-Sproles 1-2 punch they used to have? I think not.