Far and away worth the risk. The window closes when you start having to pay your franchise players. When Dak gets his payday, our chance of winning the Super Bowl drops.
yes they have to pay tony next year anyway, so they should keep him 1 more year , it would be worth it.
It's certainly not difficult for me. You're going to pay him $19 million whether he's here or he's not here. So we're just talking about the $5 million. If that's the difference between having a 2015 Dallas Cowboys team and a 2016 Dallas Cowboys team, I'll take the latter.
It's worth adding a solid defensive piece, instead.
You severely overvalue the backup quarterback.
Well and what if the def piece is a thornton, and then Dak gets hurt ??
The Raiders probably do, too. Oh wait..................
Not at all. If there was a way to save Tony Romo's entire 2017 salary, then I'm all for letting him go. That's just not the case. We have Dak Prescott on a fourth round rookie contract which costs practically nothing and the salary cap is going to bump up a good deal this year. The salary cap hit will not be nearly as bad keeping Romo.
What if Dak doesn't get hurt? Odds are Dak will not be out for the season next year
And someone will absolutely, positively take him. You will probably get a defensive piece for him. The idea of him just sitting on the bench is infuriating.
Do Romo's recent actions indicate he would do that to the team? My impression is that he wants to do what's best for Dallas and himself. If the Cowboys can find a viable trade partner, Romo will go.
.
We know he doesn't. It's been made clear. He wants to start. No matter what happens, Tony Romo won't be the permanent starter here.
If Romo is still here, no one had anything to offer in return for a ready to go starting quarterback (albeit with injury issues). It would be a major failure for the Cowboys if Romo were still here.
