TD production, from Crayton, is not the issue. Nor does it really answer the question of what happens if TO goes down. Everybody knows that if TO goes down, we are in real trouble. Nobody wants to look at that and I don't blame them because it will be a long season, IMO, and at this point in the year everybody knows that hope springs eternal. If you want to see if Crayton can really do the job, then you have to look at what he has done when neither TO or Glenn were on the field. In the past, both of those guys were the #1 coverage responsabilities for opposing defenses. If Crayton is going to carry the load if TO does go down, then the only meaningful stats is what he has done when he is the lead WR threat. I don't even know if we have enough info to be able to look at that eventuallity properly. For those who say that Felix Jones is the answer to the lack of proven WR depth, I guess I'd just make one comment. We have 2nd and 3rd year WRs who have not made the transition from the college WR position to the Pro WR position. Why would we expect Felix Jones, as a rookie, to be able to come in and produce the way a #2 or #3 WR would? Perhaps in time, but I doubt very much if that will happen in his rookie year. Compare him to Reggie Bush if you like but Bush played in a Pro Style offense that featured his ability to play a multi purpose role on offense. Jones, at Arkansas, did not.
Would be great to have another WR threat in the lineup. I don't believe Crayton is the answer, especially if TO goes down but it's irrelivent at this point. The person who asked, who could we have brought in, is the one who chimes loudest in this thread IMO. We have who we have until an option presents itself. I am for going out and getting Bolding, Williams or any other very good WR but at this point, that possability has apparently not presented itself. We have who we have right now and if TO goes down, then we are in for a long season. To me, those are the facts.