Dak has become a national joke

[meddleroidz]

schultz and Zeke played horribly, Dak will still beat on the NFC east and get enough wins for another playoffs year next year, rinse repeat!

 

[Calvin2Tony2Emmitt2Julius]

Dak’s paycheck demands that it be closer to a 1 man show than a team effort.

How Dak's Not even top 10 salaries for QB so How Do you come up with That.

I get it you guys are butt hurt right now, some of you been assburnt since Dak got the job.

But that doesn't mean you'll get away with saying idiotic ish

 

[IceStar-D7]

Jerry has been a laughingstock? This is news to me. Seems like the media loves him.

They love him because he keeps the Cowboys relevant. Everywhere but on the field.

 

[Calvin2Tony2Emmitt2Julius]

They love him because he keeps the Cowboys relevant. Everywhere but on the field.

BS

 

[IceStar-D7]

BS

You tell me about the last 28 years. Now that'll be the real BS!

 

[KJJ]

If you want a national joke look at the Cleveland Browns. They gave up three first round draft picks and a huge guaranteed contract for a QB who was 3-3 and completed 58% of his passes and had a 79.1 passer rating.

 

[pitt33]

There is no economic impact. He's your QB for years to come.

Enjoy.

I think I’m gonna be sick

 

[stinkface]

When Jerry discounts his Jerseys we will know he's toast.

 

[CanadianCowboysFan]

To me this is worse than all the interceptions he has thrown and all the games he has blown. He has become a disgrace and is hurting the brand. At what point does the economic impact outweigh his paycheck and is that when he will finally be cut. I think Jerry could get him to waive his trade clause if he sits dak down and shows him the harm he is doing to the brand beyond that I would cut him and eat the dead cap.

hurting the brand? hahaha the brand stayed healthy when we had Quincy and Hutchless as the QB.

If we had to eat 89 million this year, how do you propose we will out a roster of 53 with the remaining money?

 

[irishline]

I find the joke in regard to the Cowboys resides in the disappointed fans of this team who look but don't see.

Dak did not give away points by the first pick. There was a great deal of field left before it could be assumed Dallas would have scored. So much so that the Cowboys were in the shadow of their own goal. And with the fans who continually suggest Dak is crapola on a swizzle stick, to assume he would have driven the field and scored sort of contradicts your bias.

There is a high probability he gave up three points on the second pick. I don't believe anyone could assume more than three.

What are you taling about here? The first interception was at our own 21. We only gave up 3 because the defense held them. He literally cost those points with the pick that would have been a 38 yard field goal where the 49ers got the ball after the pick. I mean Literally.

The 2nd interception happened in field goal range at the San Fransisco 12. So not only did the 49ers kick a field goal before halftime, but we lost the opportunity to kick a field goal or score a touchdown ourselves.

Really Dak was responisble for at minimum of a six point swing (if he hadn't thrown the 2nd INT and we missed the FG since the clock would have run down on 2nd/3rd down before the attempt instead of them getting the ball with 1:15 left). If we scored a FG or TD in the last minute of the half instead of their FG after the interception then we are talking a 9 to 13 point swing at half (with the first interception's FG included).

 

[Calvin2Tony2Emmitt2Julius]

You tell me about the last 28 years. Now that'll be the real BS!

BS and more BS

I told you 28ers, you look at things differently than I do. So don't run at me with that 28years BS. I have been a fan of the Cowboys for the past 50 years so 28 don't mean sh@# to me.

Look, I said it once , I'll say it again Super Bowls do not dictate my fandom, In any way. and the fact that they mean so much to you, I don't know you, probably don't want to Chief.

Go spout your Winning ain't every thing ..... Yada yada yada Trash somewhere else. Cause it get's none here

 

[Sarek]

Dak needs a fresh start somewhere else. Will be good for him.

 

[Kingofholland]

To me this is worse than all the interceptions he has thrown and all the games he has blown. He has become a disgrace and is hurting the brand. At what point does the economic impact outweigh his paycheck and is that when he will finally be cut. I think Jerry could get him to waive his trade clause if he sits dak down and shows him the harm he is doing to the brand beyond that I would cut him and eat the dead cap.

Maybe he just needs a different sleep number or stop getting tackled by housewives.

 

[Praxit]

..Dak eleminating all his app accnts. TWTR, INsta,TicTK...etc..

 

[Rockport]

To me this is worse than all the interceptions he has thrown and all the games he has blown. He has become a disgrace and is hurting the brand. At what point does the economic impact outweigh his paycheck and is that when he will finally be cut. I think Jerry could get him to waive his trade clause if he sits dak down and shows him the harm he is doing to the brand beyond that I would cut him and eat the dead cap.

No it’s you Dak Haters who are national disgraces.

 

[TwoDeep3]

It’s not the points. It’s the increased snaps the defense had to take cuz of his turnovers. It let them a defense that only had five days off to become more tired than they needed too

His first int. Put the defense on the field for an 8 additional snaps. The second another 8. Plus the yards and the extra effort they had to put out to stop them from scoring on a short field. Look pollard gets injured. You’re on the 18 yards line bro. You got 2nd and 2 and you throw an int. All the man had to do is tuck and run. That is inexcusable. Jimmy would have benched him on the spot

Yet, how many additional snaps were added when Pollard went down in the second quarter, and the defense was put on the field with unsuccessful offensive series for the rest of the game?

You see, you focus on one aspect and attribute it to the entire game, when the real moments when the team failed happened after the seminal injury which removed the running game from the offense.

Had Pollard remained on the field and not been injured in what should be considered a completely illegal tackle, Dallas still had a shot at winning the game. Especially when the defense continued its best play and held the 9ers to a tie up until moments before the fourth quarter began.

But the lack of offensive success has a singular moment in time where it was no longer competitive. And that moment was when Pollard was injured.

I believe Dallas would have won the game had Pollard not gone down. And I think back to the 1993 Super Bowl where Aikman played like crap all day. Washington got the lead at the beginning of the third quarter, and Emmitt ran the ball and carried the team.

I believe Pollard would have done the same for this Dallas team, had it not been for the injury.

 

[Diehardblues]

I think at some point it does. It affects ticket sales, or merchandise, maybe some ad revenue. If people see that Jerry is not putting the best product on the field he can at some point it hits the bottom line. It’s like of ford is making defective cars at some point it will cost sales.

Some of us have been hoping it would impact revenue for over 25 years now. I was part of long time season ticket holders from Texas Stadium which campaigned against the new stadium as we feared once those PSL were committed there would be no stopping our ownership.

Guess what it hasn’t. And its unlikely it will enough for Jethro to step down.

The fix is in with Equal TV revenue, PSL on season ticket sales and stadium sponsorship. About the only revenue stream affected over the years occasionally is merchandise sales but that impact is marginal at best. Not enough to offset increases from the other streams.

 

[TwoDeep3]

What are you taling about here? The first interception was at our own 21. We only gave up 3 because the defense held them.

The 2nd interception happened in field goal range at the San Fransisco 12. So not only did the 49ers kick a field goal before halftime, but we lost the opportunity to kick a field goal or score a touchdown ourselves.

Really Dak was responisble for at minimum of a six point swing (if we missed the FG and they drove for theirs after which is highly unlikely since the clock would have been run down). If we scored a FG or TD in the last minute of the half instead of their FG after the interception then we are talking a 9 to 13 point swing at half (with the first interception's FG included).

And six points would not have won the game. I stated exactly what you did about field position. Your argument doesn't address the lack of offense after Pollard's injury.

 

[IceStar-D7]

BS and more BS

I told you 28ers, you look at things differently than I do. So don't run at me with that 28years BS. I have been a fan of the Cowboys for the past 50 years so 28 don't mean sh@# to me.

Look, I said it once , I'll say it again Super Bowls do not dictate my fandom, In any way. and the fact that they mean so much to you, I don't know you, probably don't want to Chief.

Go spout your Winning ain't every thing ..... Yada yada yada Trash somewhere else. Cause it get's none here

Who said anything about Super Bowls? We haven't even been relevant in most of those years to even think about a SB. But you want to kiss Jerry's ring? Be my quest. Jerry Jones has been mostly BAD for the on-field Dallas Cowboys. Try 28 years and NO Championship game. Forget even talking about a SB

 

[Swagger]

Clown show