And the insinuation here is by you: That Romo couldn't win big games, when he actually did. And ironically enough you are using the logical fallacy that that dak should've, could've, would've won a game that he didn't. Remember the closest we've have come to an NFC Championship game is still 2014 since the Aikman era.
And you are saying that Romo hasn't won numerous games with 4th quarter comebacks? Again, you are trying to prove that Dak is not the new Romo, or was at least before Garret was fired. Like I said, he has something that romo didn't have, and that is a supposedly decent coach later on in his career versus at the beginning of it. Also many of the things the Dak Crowd accuses people of doing to Dak they are guilty of doing to Romo. They'll call Romo a Choker, whereas it is just as easy to say Dak has choked at this point.
The problem really is you presume what I am putting stock in or not. As part of the whole Dak is the whole Romo narrative, the fact that the syndrome of having one good season followed by one bad season hasn't changed under Dak. I know you all will come up with excuses, that it was Garrett's fault, Dak could've, would've, should've... But then those were all true under Romo too. Hopefully the new head coach will change how things have been in the past. But the biggest problem here never was garret; it was Jerrah. It still remains to be seen if the cowboys can break out of the cycle.
You might disagree, but many of us believe that the RAMS were able to game plan against Dak. Romo had his flaws, but you couldn't really game plan against him. To Dak's credit, he has improved his game and I don't think teams can Game Plan against him the way they did.
No it is people who jock sniff and the haters that are bias. This board has both. I call things how I see them, which may or may not be right. I could admit Romo's flaws as I can admit Dak's flaws. Like I said both were good quarterbacks, but certainly not elite. I also don't like excuses which a lot of the jock sniffers use, waah waah waah it was the defense, waah waah waah it was Zeke, and so on and so on, except for their man crush. Yes the Rams took away our running game, because they were betting that Dak couldn't beat them, because of his flaws, and they were right. To his credit Dak worked hard the following off season, and teams couldn't do that to him anymore. Who is more bias? The guy who can say good and bad things about a player, or the guy who only can say positive things about a player and seems to have an excuse for every loss. Personally, I'd prefer it if people didn't make excuses and wouldn't brag about how great someone is after a loss. Bragging rights are meant to be earned. Like Jimmy says, if you going to talk the talk, you gotta walk the walk...