“I’ll never accept Dak as our QB no matter what.”Is “mouth breathing trash” your new insult for the week? You have repeated the phrase in every post. All of your post are full of childish insults that for some reason are allowed here. Now to the topic, stop Zeke, beat Dallas. That formula worked again. Daring Dak to beat the defense has a high success rate. Get over it.
Feeding Zeke is why we lost.That loss last night proves we don't need to feed Zeke to win!
*Smiles and nods politely*
I never said anything to the contrary, genius.
In fact, you made my point for me. See how many touches Zeke got in those games.
18 rushes for 1.8 per carry vs the Saints.
28 rushes for 3.8 per carry vs the Jets.
Because Zeke averaged 22 carries/game in those 3 losses, despite awful production.So in three games that Elliott was shut down, Dallas lost all three. How does this make your point that Dallas doesn't need Elliott and can ride Prescott's arm?
If Dallas had won your point would be true. But the comebacks on Prescott's arm all fell short.
Yeah, it is code for Dallas never winning a Super Bowl with an inconsistent QB among other things. There is a reason why Dak is not as highly thought of around the league as he is in Dallas. Your mommy must have really blew a lot of smoke up your rear end to make you feel so superior to others. You really have such an overvalued opinion of yourself .“I’ll never accept Dak as our QB no matter what.”
- @jnday
We all know what that’s code for.
I’m glad you know that you’re the inferior bile I was referring to.
That is the game plan of every defense that faces Dallas and when the game is put in Dak’s hands without Zeke , the results have not been good for Dallas.Because Zeke averaged 22 carries/game in those 3 losses, despite awful production.
There is no reason on Earth for Zeke to get 20 carries for 47 yards, ESPECIALLY when we’re losing for most of the game.
We keep feeding him even when he’s ineffective, because we paid him a ton and are therefore stuck on being a “balanced” offense.
When Dak is rolling and Zeke is struggling like they were last night, put the game in Dak’s hands.
So in three games that Elliott was shut down, Dallas lost all three. How does this make your point that Dallas doesn't need Elliott and can ride Prescott's arm?
If Dallas had won your point would be true. But the comebacks on Prescott's arm all fell short.
That is the game plan of every defense that faces Dallas and when the game is put in Dak’s hands without Zeke , the results have not been good for Dallas.
Yeah, it is code for Dallas never winning a Super Bowl with an inconsistent QB among other things. There is a reason why Dak is not as highly thought of around the league as he is in Dallas. Your mommy must have really blew a lot of smoke up your rear end to make you feel so superior to others. You really have such an overvalued opinion of yourself .
If you drop both safeties deep on that play, you leave one receiver uncovered.Yes, they actually were.. all game long.. the third and seven at 4:51, on the Cobb TD.. one safety deep..
They dared Zeke to beat them, and he couldn't do it. Dak still balled out anyways.
They thought if they emptied the box, they could get us to run. They were right.
I just read that Dak was pressured 40% of the time. I'll post more later when I get some time.Percy you have a source for pressures/hurries/hits from Sunday night?
Ughh this post should be dead...nice game couldn’t get over the hump and they lost....again.
They dared Zeke to beat them, and he couldn't do it. Dak still balled out anyways.