aikemirv
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,405
- Reaction score
- 9,999
60 is too small of a sample size.
So how many games is a trend? Just so I know for future reference because that is 12% of the season
60 is too small of a sample size.
Dallas led the Skins the entire game. They weren't outplayed by any objective observer...oh forgot who I was responding to. Carry on.That's what makes this next game so interesting. If they get out played again that makes 3 straight and I think you can say at that point they are playing their worst football of the season.
2 games is 2 games. Doesnt matter if its a 2 game season or a 200 game season.So how many games is a trend? Just so I know for future reference because that is 12% of the season
The Vikings defense at their house is prob top 2 in NFL.
Oh yeah, we won. Sometimes I think people forget..
The Vikings defense at their house is prob top 2 in NFL.
Oh yeah, we won. Sometimes I think people forget..
On CZ or somewhere else? Because I'd challenge you to find a quote where some are calling wins losses. Let's not exaggerate to make a point. lolI know. Never seen so many people so hungry for a loss. Some of them are even calling wins losses now.
Wow!!! God help us if we actually do lose to the Giants. I'm not even going to log on.
Without penalties or turnovers? Is this a real comment?We won and the reason it was close was not because of Dak. I think somebody showed 4 drives stopped because of penalty and 2 because of turnover and QB strips happen to every QB every year, it is inevitible. This team without penalties or turnovers will more than likely go at least 14-2 and maybe 15-1 and get homefield advantage and barring a defensive meltdown will make it to the NFC title game or the Superbowl.
Witten did not have a catch and Beasley had 2. This team needs more than that from those 2 to have a successful run in the postseason.
He's done well, never said he didn't . But in the playoffs we'll need more. That is all I'm saying. He has regressed the last couple games. It's a valid question being asked. If he was hot right no one would be nervous. But many are asking if he's hit a rookie wall. It's interesting cause you have one of the best pure passers on the bench right now. So I ask myself if Dak struggles for another game or 2 do we put in Romo and take this offense to another whole lvl or just stick with Dak regardless of his sub 200 yard games?
Yep I don't have the statistical research tools to verify which plays were actually scramble versus a run/pass option. How do you know 5 were a run/pass option?
In general though it does not matter because he ran 3.3 times per game in the first 10 games and 7 times per game in the last 2 so the basis in my argument does not change because I do not believe the coaching staff is calling more run plays
Without penalties or turnovers? Is this a real comment?
The browns would be leading their division without penalties or turnovers.I'm sorry, was that too obvious for you. Not every team can win because they have low penalties and very few turnovers. We are so efficient, that if we do not have many penalties and don't turn the ball over, our defense, as bad as they are at times, still does not lose the game for us.
He had a good day, looking over his body of work that has t been the case which is why he has the rep he has for being a gun slinger. He has learned but so will Dakota.Lmao what? Every pass in Seattle two years ago was in a tight window.
Throwing guys open yes tight windows no, we can go back and forth on that one all day and neither will convince the other otherwise without film and I have nothing but memories.Romo is one of the best in the business at throwing into tight windows and throwing guys open. Not sure what you've been watching there.
He had a good day, looking over his body of work that has t been the case which is why he has the rep he has for being a gun slinger. He has learned but so will Dakota.
Well they can't be mad at wins, but they are. Airman wasn't a 300 yard a game passer every weekbut he seems to do just fine, oh yeah he had Emmitt. That's why Dakota has Zeke so he doesn't have to be a 300 yard passer either, the formula works just some people have agendas to not like anything this team does. Even though they're fans.I know. Never seen so many people so hungry for a loss. Some of them are even calling wins losses now.
Wow!!! God help us if we actually do lose to the Giants. I'm not even going to log on.
Dez was wide open in that game for a 50 yard pass that inflated his numbers. I watched the entire Minnesota game and he couldn't do anything
Exactly. This thread is about passing yards and 38% of Dak's passing yardage against the Vikings came on one play with a blown coverage where Dez didn't have a DB within 5 yards.
Pointing that out isn't crapping on Dak, its a fact and its perfectly valid to look at the stats with that kind of context in mind.