cowboygo
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 852
- Reaction score
- 1,063
So a second rounder for a rental to play in the Superbowl?
A late 2nd rounder for a rental (a damn good one) & a late 3rd rounder (compensatory pick).
So a second rounder for a rental to play in the Superbowl?
There is not enough "pie" for the stars we already have.
We have Quinn and Taco is coming on strong, why waste the pick?Hear me out and correct me if I’m wrong...
Clowney is in a contract year right?
If we give up a 2nd round pick for him then wouldn’t we receive a compensatory 3rd or 4th rounder back for him?
I think for a 1 year rental having Clowney and DLaw as our D Ends would significantly increase our chance of reaching and winning the Super Bowl.
Even if we need to sweeten the pot with someone like Crawford or whatever I think it’s a deal worth looking at.
Rumors that Philly want him too.
He’s going to be traded so why not go all in with this move?
Hear me out and correct me if I’m wrong...
Clowney is in a contract year right?
If we give up a 2nd round pick for him then wouldn’t we receive a compensatory 3rd or 4th rounder back for him?
I think for a 1 year rental having Clowney and DLaw as our D Ends would significantly increase our chance of reaching and winning the Super Bowl.
Even if we need to sweeten the pot with someone like Crawford or whatever I think it’s a deal worth looking at.
Rumors that Philly want him too.
He’s going to be traded so why not go all in with this move?
He refuses to sign his franchise tag. What would we pay him?1 year rental and get a compensatory pick back.
We have Quinn and Taco is coming on strong, why waste the pick?
We have Quinn and Taco is coming on strong, why waste the pick?
Hear me out and correct me if I’m wrong...
Clowney is in a contract year right?
If we give up a 2nd round pick for him then wouldn’t we receive a compensatory 3rd or 4th rounder back for him?
I think for a 1 year rental having Clowney and DLaw as our D Ends would significantly increase our chance of reaching and winning the Super Bowl.
Even if we need to sweeten the pot with someone like Crawford or whatever I think it’s a deal worth looking at.
Rumors that Philly want him too.
He’s going to be traded so why not go all in with this move?
I logged in just so I could like this post.If you want to bring in a player, bring in a DT or S.
Not another DE.
Definitely don’t won’t to give up such a high draft pick for a 1 year rental. That’s not good business. And definitely don’t want another player trying to hold us hostage for a longer contract. I’m sick of all these contract negotiations.
Hear me out and correct me if I’m wrong...
Clowney is in a contract year right?
If we give up a 2nd round pick for him then wouldn’t we receive a compensatory 3rd or 4th rounder back for him?
I think for a 1 year rental having Clowney and DLaw as our D Ends would significantly increase our chance of reaching and winning the Super Bowl.
Even if we need to sweeten the pot with someone like Crawford or whatever I think it’s a deal worth looking at.
Rumors that Philly want him too.
He’s going to be traded so why not go all in with this move?
there is this thing.... its called the salary cap......
Some of you guys never want to take a risk to win a title NOW.
We have Tank, Quinn, and very solid depth. It’s kinda overkill on DE with another one..
Get us a better 1-Tech...
No thanks. Not that you’re wrong. Not that I wouldn’t love having Clowney, but in my opinion we need to pay out to the big three, and drafting well helps to keep this team within cap and youth parameters.Hear me out and correct me if I’m wrong...
Clowney is in a contract year right?
If we give up a 2nd round pick for him then wouldn’t we receive a compensatory 3rd or 4th rounder back for him?
I think for a 1 year rental having Clowney and DLaw as our D Ends would significantly increase our chance of reaching and winning the Super Bowl.
Even if we need to sweeten the pot with someone like Crawford or whatever I think it’s a deal worth looking at.
Rumors that Philly want him too.
He’s going to be traded so why not go all in with this move?
I have a question:
If he's not reporting under the tag to the Texans, why would he play under it for another team?
I wonder if the 92 team would have one without ONE player that came to the party late via trade?There's a fine line between taking a risk and simply making a bad move based on the "one player away" fallacy.