BouncingCheese;2051448 said:Hopefully this means that the team has warmed up to Carpenter and not to Zach Thomas; he is slow, old and a walking concussion waiting to happen.
And for all those talking about how Fasano and Ayodele, really we traded away a 2nd round pick that it took to get Fasano in the first place, so really its not such a great deal.
tomson75;2051483 said:Your analysis of Thomas is....not so good. Thomas can still play his *** off.
I agree.
Da Hammer;2051487 said:Fasano pick was just so horrible considering we had no need for him when we drafted him. and please nobody mention the 2 TE crap that was supposed to be the reason! now we are having a lot of flexibility this draft with trades the last couple days... that i like!
tomson75 said:...and you're basing this on all three of Curtis' catches? Seriously, I don't see how any of us can pretend that we actually know what we have with him. It worries me that he was a longshot to make the team last year...although I guess this is a good sign that the team likes him.
I hope your not one of those "selective memory" people. Fasano played well for us. He'll be a starter, and likely a decent one, at Miami.
Fasano was a top TE coming out of college. You don't get those in the fourth round very often.
tomson75 said:All that being said, I'm hoping Curtis blows up this year.
iceberg;2051480 said:were you talking about *our* roy williams? we can't trade him. if you're talking detroit then i'm lost in this thread and all the activity going on and misunderstood you.
backing out to a cold beer now.
Ken;2051478 said:Well, this is a good move, imo.
as long as everyone understands that Fasano may very well become a good te in this league. He has talent and he is certainly going to get his opportunity.
Having said that, he wasn't going to play here and Curtis really showed some great stuff last year. He should be fine in the backup role.
Also, that pick at the top of the 4th is extremely valuable. I won't be surprised to see us trade down with that pick for multiple picks.
CowboysNumeroUno;2051501 said:No big, just too many Roy Williams's.
I think the original post suggested trading #22 and this new 4th for Roy Willliams (Detroit).
Wimbo;2051443 said:On the new chart that is floating around (adjusting for the high cost of top picks), that would equal 1802 points, which lands right between the value of #3 and #4 overall (1825 and 1750).
yea those were the reasons... :bang2: :bang2: :bang2: You could have 20 men blocking and bledslow would have still gotten sacked at a high rate...YoMick;2051494 said:Wasnt it also to protect Drew Bledsoe?
Leave 2 TE's back there?
superpunk;2051503 said:Bloody hell.
This is a dumb trade. There is really no point to it.
btcutter;2051502 said:I disagree. This is our year to make a run at SB. We don't even know if Thomas can play in our system or if he is healthy or can stay healthy. Akin is a proven commodity. He may not be great but we know what he brings. If nothing else, he can give you incredible depth and insurance for this yr.
As for Fasano, I don't care that he left. Curtis is better than Fasano.
I think Parcell is raping JJ in broad day light but JJ is smiling like a *****.:bang2:
Bungarian;2051482 said:I don't like the idea of trading away talent. Never know when injuries will hit. That is why New England does well. They keep quality backups.