RoboQB
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,522
- Reaction score
- 10,836
Go ahead, buddy. Get it all out..lol Good grief.What a load of bs….so dak made the defense quit on the opening drive when the packers took the ball first and scored even though the offense hadn’t touched the ball yet? the other teams quarterback has called out our scheme and the fact that we had safeties playing linebacker and they were confident in what they could do That’s on dak too? You have a clear agenda. The defense sucked because they sucked. They were out of position, sloppy on tackling, and that had nothing at all to do with dak- who also played poorly.
Even after halftime when the deficit was down to 17 the packers took the ball right down the field and scored again. The defense was bad. That doesn’t mean dak wasn’t bad himself but to say it’s daks fault why the defense was terrible is just such a ridiculous statement and you can’t be taken seriously. Dak was bad. The defense was bad. Both are true but the defense wasn’t bad because of dak. That’s on them.
Get real
I've repeatedly condemned the defense for their part.
Do you dispute that a leader should step in with confidence and lead the offense down the field?
It was 27-0 in the 2nd quarter and Dak was responsible for 13 of the 27pts.
Nobody is trying to obsolve the defense (and DC) of blame. However, it starts and ends with the QB.
Here's an example: Nobody is saying how "Chris Jones is entering Tom Brady-level with 3 SBs in 4 years."
Why? Because Chris Jones isn't a QB.
Relax. They don't care if we care, or not..lol