TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 83,520
- Reaction score
- 76,362
Because he doesn’t agree with you? Are people capable of not being morons and disagreeing with you?He’s still a moron for that take and my points stand.
Because he doesn’t agree with you? Are people capable of not being morons and disagreeing with you?He’s still a moron for that take and my points stand.
So...you found a source that supported your opinion and argument?People had them losing to the Buccs….history tried to say otherwise though.
Do you object to the principle of that? Or just the side you're on?Because he doesn’t agree with you? Are people capable of not being morons and disagreeing with you?
Dude there are very few please don't try to use that as some kind of narrative no most of our players are overrated they go to other teams and disappear out of the league shortly after... I mean I get your point but they're not a whole bunch of instances where they want to ring or even were very successful anywhere else but the Cowboys have made most of those choices to get rid of those players whether it was age or money or whatever it was...Cowboys players who fans turn sour on always leave and perform well on their new teams. Some even win a ring.
Right it was every narrative right outdoors on grass against Tom Brady who he never beat on the road I mean it was all these there it is that we couldn't do but then we blew them out all of a sudden they were a bad team right we ended Tom Brady's career but ohh he was washed up..lol the goal posts are always moved... I mean the Eagles lost to the bucks with that quarterback I mean Baker Mayfield huh? We hit a buzz saw with Green Bay but I'm almost sure not terribly sure we would have been better going on the road and we probably would have beat the bucks...People had them losing to the Buccs….history tried to say otherwise though.
Well that's kind of easy dude, because he's had two second round exits lol...It just depends on what you think of Dak. I personally think he can get over this mental hump he’s in.
But if I felt like he couldn’t? I’d agree. I don’t think his ceiling is first round exits.
that is true and I agree with that statement but here's the alternate reality of that aikman and Roger would not win on these teams because they wouldn't have Tony Dorsett and Emmitt Smith with a ridiculously physical offensive line who actually showed up in the playoffs along with the defense and some of the best coaching Staffs in the history of the sport...There is no Aikman in this draft or next year either. Reset your expectations. They will be good QBs that need a lot of help. No difference
It just depends on what you think of Dak. I personally think he can get over this mental hump he’s in.
But if I felt like he couldn’t? I’d agree. I don’t think his ceiling is first round exits.
Those "other" franchises won't have 5 rings and 8 SB appearances. Any franchise like the Steelers, Patriots (now) and 49ers would have been DONE with Dak. So...B'BYE..Hellmans right. Dak wouldn’t get near the hate that he gets with Dallas fans and especially CZ fans.
Dak would get a rough ride if he played in a city where the fans and media weren't a bunch of powder puffs.Dak would get the same amount of hate from the fans of the team he was with if he had put up a 2-5 playoff record and looked the way he has doing it the last 3 years. To say otherwise would be disingenuous at best.
Dallas is no closer to a Superbowl with him then they were 8 years ago (not all his fault obviously but he has been part of the problem more than he has been part of the solution).
I know at least we'd have the hope of unknown potential.Frankly, I think I'd rather suffer through a one win season to get the #1 pick. It worked with Aikman.
It won’t be long now until he’s extended.Those "other" franchises won't have 5 rings and 8 SB appearances. Any franchise like the Steelers, Patriots (now) and 49ers would have been DONE with Dak. So...B'BYE..
I laughed out loud at the inference that I am a Dak "lover". Sure the Cowboys had 9 all-pros, but at the end of the day they could not run the football or stop the run. Oh, some Dak lovers might point out that Dak was one of those 9 all-pros.We had 9 AP's last year . What Kills me is Dak Lovers always claiming the FO never puts a good team, while the QB shites his panties
And soon after he'll choke and everyone will pretend they can't correlate his high pay to the "lack of talent around him".It won’t be long now until he’s extended.
And yet we got no further in the playoffs with Romo or Dak than we did with Quincy Carter.Good luck this run of stumbling into good QBs. It took five years to stumble in the Romo and look at our records prior to that. We couldn’t have gotten luckier stumbling into Dak when we did with Romo’s body falling apart. The last three times he hit the ground something broke.
If your strength is not a strength...that's the problem. Sure we had a weak running game...so does most of the NFL. But the point is that our "strength" - the passing game - consistently underforms in those moments TOO. So deflecting blame to the running game is kind of a smokescreen.I laughed out loud at the inference that I am a Dak "lover". Sure the Cowboys had 9 all-pros, but at the end of the day they could not run the football or stop the run. Oh, some Dak lovers might point out that Dak was one of those 9 all-pros.
How do people NOT get this?!? No, we didn't "get lucky" with Romo OR Dak and it would have been BETTER had we sucked and built those same teams around a real QB. Most of the best QB are first rounders. No, not all first rounders pan out - and yes there is a nature/nurture thing going on here - but most of the QBs are 1st rounders.And yet we got no further in the playoffs with Romo or Dak than we did with Quincy Carter.
Playoff results matter.
We didn't stumble into any good QB situation. It would have been better for Dallas to keep having bad QBs like Carter so that we could keep getting high draft picks rather than waste damn near two decades on QBs with pretty stats and a choke factor in the playoffs or big games while having to draft mid to late every round.
We never got past the wildcard round with Carter. We got past the wildcard round twice with Romo and Dak so we did get further with them. The playoffs do matter and you need to make them to have a chance. If it was up to fans like you we would never make the playoffs. You’re one of those that would rather have high draft picks every year than make the playoffs. You would have us wasting a bunch of high draft picks on QBs the next couple of decades. You sound like a typical fan.And yet we got no further in the playoffs with Romo or Dak than we did with Quincy Carter.
Playoff results matter.
We didn't stumble into any good QB situation. It would have been better for Dallas to keep having bad QBs like Carter so that we could keep getting high draft picks rather than waste damn near two decades on QBs with pretty stats and a choke factor in the playoffs or big games while having to draft mid to late every round.