jterrell;4413287 said:
Can't see his remarks since he is ignored but I will respond to your back pat since it allowed me the info.
I didn't move any damn goalposts. The post I quoted stated he was the next Hutchinson. That is super elite. The guy is a very likely Hall of Famer.
That was the source of my response.
And I do see the ONE guy (who is barely 30 an has zero real experience outside takign a GM class) has him top 5. If he is TRULY top 5 on our board we'd have to take him at 14 for certain.
Just to be clear though. DeCastro is not anything near a consensus top 5 prospect in this draft. And thus my point remains. You do not grade an OG evenly with other positions. If he is an 11 overall and you pick 14th, that doesn't mean he is anywhere near the best real value. If a CB is also there and ranked 15th you draft the CB every time.
Holland and Dockery can start for you at OG at a 3 mil total cost for them both. Good luck finding a starting CB for under 5 mil. There is a very real positional value curve.
The best thing about these forums is it proves there are guys who would be worse GMs than Jerry Jones.
It is unfortunate the archives aren't around longer so you can see who really has credibility over time when discussing players.
Measureables are for sharing, not in achieving feedback for their observations.
Kumkwat crumble, with caramel sauce...whimsical with thrill of taste...how chick.
Hey, if one pursues a ta ta ta, and playful, hey, that's your palate. Add a little strawberry gamboge if wanted. But more definite?
But to use ignore due to one not liking French Cuisine is a tad self serving.
It still boils down to taste there. Even Spanish cuisine uses pop with spice.
So, in parceling out the above view, and discouting aspects of another's, as presented above, the discussion falls upon causes at view. Here, it still falls upon logical reliance upon elements of a Dockery, Holland, and even potential Kosier's return presence to overcome the deficiency in the drama filled need exhibited last season in it's offensive line's interior. The reliance upon youth, was at onset the fabric in distrust for that element's failure.
So a return to that very base, relying upon money concerns, and not coaching up talent and change, means to intensify the original problem as well. As those old elements, in Dockery, Holland, and Kosier...are getting as old as the higher priced pieces of Marc Colombo, Andre Gurode, and Leonard Davis released the previous season. But all their legs and mobility issues being at the center for change then. What, that same mobility and injury problem would suddenly disappear now, due to money fears?
Oh, how Pigsweet in production methods...