The thread is about defense winning championships. You and others have pointed to that play as an example of defense winning championships.
I am simply pointing out that the defense was gifted that play by the ineptitude of the offense, which makes it a poor example to use to support the notion that defenses win championships, as a hard and fast rule.
I didn't take anything you wrote as discrediting Mahomes. Not sure why you're bringing that in.
I mentioned Mahomes in order for any reader to reply suggesting I was lessening his impact on the game. It is the OP's main contention that Mahomes' contribution outweighs anything that the defense did last night.
The defense did help win last night as well. Agreed, the defense scored on an easy gift turnover
but it did happen. It was not a mirage. And it was neither Kansas City's offense nor Mahomes who tacked those points on the scoreboard.
It is my opinion, which may not be shared with many others, that the 'defense wins championships' analogy will always be applicable if-and-until a Super Bowl is decided by offense alone. No punts. No turnovers. No sacks. No safeties. No interceptions. No pass deflections. No tackles behind the line of scrimmage. Etc.
In other words, the phrase will remain acceptable for me if-and-until the National Football League converts to flag football. I mean, beyond the Pro Bowl that is. lol.