StarBoyz83
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,434
- Reaction score
- 11,978
He has a better chance at keeping dallas a float if Romo goes down. he also will take away meaningful snaps from a rookie qb if we draft one..
Get him. Romo is done
Yes we should get him. No Romo is not done
But our scheme isn't the right scheme for him.
Yeah, I think so
Dude is waste of space at this point. We have yet to win with him, and hes deteriorating.
Go be with your family Romo
Good grief.Dude is waste of space at this point.
You don't know what you're talking about but never mind.Until defenses figured him out.
Like I said, it's not the right scheme for any QB. Romo in this offense is what Peyton was for the Colts. It's built on him improvising, anticipating, he makes all the audibles, he sets the entire thing up on the field. Playbook/Schemewise this offense is about as basic as it gets. Anybody can play in this offense but virtually nobody is going to excel in it unless you are a good QB. And no backup QB is a good QB otherwise they would be starting. RG3 has shown he can be an elite QB so unless you have a better option that's the guy we should target. Enough with these garbage QB's that "fit this offense" but yet somehow become turnover machines and lose games for us. What good is a terrible backup that fits your scheme? What's the point?But our scheme isn't the right scheme for him.
Our scheme is not the right scheme for ANY QB. Does anyone realize that even Romo only has ONE winning season under Garrett???
Like I said, it's not the right scheme for any QB. Romo in this offense is what Peyton was for the Colts. It's built on him improvising, anticipating, he makes all the audibles, he sets the entire thing up on the field. Playbook/Schemewise this offense is about as basic as it gets. Anybody can play in this offense but virtually nobody is going to excel in it unless you are a good QB. And no backup QB is a good QB otherwise they would be starting. RG3 has shown he can be an elite QB so unless you have a better option that's the guy we should target. Enough with these garbage QB's that "fit this offense" but yet somehow become turnover machines and lose games for us. What good is a terrible backup that fits your scheme? What's the point?
Our scheme is not the right scheme for ANY QB. Does anyone realize that even Romo only has ONE winning season under Garrett???
What are you talking about? 90% of the offenses aren't customized towards a specific QB. You can just plug anybody in there and get them to run the offense. The only 2-3 exceptions are the Cowboys, Patriots and maybe the Steelers. You can't find guys to replace Romo, Brady or Big Ben. They run the entire thing.That can be said of any offense.
I didn't see nothing wrong with the Washington scheme when Rg3 roasted us on Thanksgiving day. The man has potential to get it done. If we can bring him in on the cheap why not he will be better than what we have at the moment.
You're a waste of a poster. Keep swallowing what ESPN feeds you.
Good grief.
YUP!
Good that means you can block me, and you wont have to see my posts anymore. It's ok, I won't beg you.
Well tell me what Romo has done. Besides pretty stats, what has he done? I'm all ears/eyes bro