Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
Vintage;1930784 said:waaaaaaaa
hey plagerist, quit stealing Bach's signature line
Vintage;1930784 said:waaaaaaaa
This team performed better in the regular season. Improved by four games. That is not the definiton of stagnant. They lost in the wild card round in 06, in the divisional round in 07. It is progress, albeit small progress.InmanRoshi;1930797 said:It turned out exactly where we were a year ago. Poor showing down the stretch and not winning playoff games. Stagnant.
The path we're headed for this offseason seems to be a familiar one ... he one where the head coach has his legs undercut away from him, and reassembing a braintrust of proven failures.
windward;1930789 said:There's no tangible evidence that this is what is taking place here. I'd wait until next season before we see anything substantial that could prove this either way.
Bringing in Ernie Zampese as a consultant would not make one damn difference one way or the other, though.
InmanRoshi;1930797 said:It turned out exactly where we were a year ago. Poor showing down the stretch and not winning playoff games. Stagnant.
The path we're headed for this offseason seems to be a familiar one ... he one where the head coach has his legs undercut away from him, and reassembing a braintrust of familiar but proven failures.
Even if he does a good job, right?Nors;1930810 said:I'm on record,
I just don't want to see Campo on our sidelines this season. PERIOD
Bob Sacamano;1930795 said::laugh2: you're a friggin' joke, dude
transparent as well
so it doesn't matter if the HC is a goof-ball w/ a poor track record, just as long as Jerry keeps his hands off his team
okay
InmanRoshi;1930797 said:It turned out exactly where we were a year ago. Poor showing down the stretch and not winning playoff games. Stagnant.
The path we're headed for this offseason seems to be a familiar one ... one where the head coach has his legs undercut away from him, and reassembing a braintrust of familiar but proven failures.
Very well stated. That's been my stance all along, not defend Jerry Jones come hell or highwater.superpunk;1930811 said:You're jumping the gun because this is what you believe will happen. The path doesn't suggest it. These are decent hires, made out of necessity because half the staff fled to Miami. I am aware of how it "feels", but that's not much to go on. Can you criticize Houck or Campo on the merits of the job they were/might be hired to do? I don't think we can, they are good at what they do.
So other than the fact that it "feels" like Jerry is doing Jerry things (as in bad Jerry things), and the very word "Campo" has terrible connotations, there's really nothing to suggest that Jerry is regressing. The draft will tell us alot regarding that. If we get crazy, I might sway to anti-Jerry sentiment. If we continue the smart course that we took last offseason, when Jerry operated without the strong hand of Bill Parcells, then I think people need to step away from their Jerry ledge for awhile, and enjoy their efforts to put a champion on the field.
superpunk;1930811 said:You're jumping the gun because this is what you believe will happen. The path doesn't suggest it. These are decent hires, made out of necessity because half the staff fled to Miami. I am aware of how it "feels", but that's not much to go on. Can you criticize Houck or Campo on the merits of the job they were/might be hired to do? I don't think we can, they are good at what they do.
So other than the fact that it "feels" like Jerry is doing Jerry things (as in bad Jerry things), and the very word "Campo" has terrible connotations, there's really nothing to suggest that Jerry is regressing. The draft will tell us alot regarding that. If we get crazy, I might sway to anti-Jerry sentiment. If we continue the smart course that we took last offseason, when Jerry operated without the strong hand of Bill Parcells, then I think people need to step away from their Jerry ledge for awhile, and enjoy their efforts to put a champion on the field.
Bob Sacamano;1930817 said:this is beyond laughable, that's more on the players and coaches, not the owner
btw, most of the staff was Bill Parcells' guys, the only guy Jerry brought in that was his was Garrett, so what if Jerry has of his guys on the staff, big whoop
Bach;1930749 said:We could make Campo HC and Lacewell GM and you and several others would spin it some how. Some of you make ES posters sound reasonable.
Oh, so maybe a coach would actually go with one of "Jerry's guys" when he couldn't get anyone of "his own guys". So why can't this be the case now? Wade going with Campo (who has a pretty darn good rep as a db coach) when "his guy" wasn't available.(Emmit Thomas)theebs;1930742 said:I think Bill genuinely liked Mike Zimmer.
Zimmer didnt like bowles and zimmer was learning on the job under bill.
Bach;1930815 said:I'm a joke? Really? I see you have to resort to namecalling because you have nothing else.
Bach said:As for Wade, he's a great DC, but not imo a great HC. But yeah, I do prefer the HC to at have control of his staff.
Don't know why this is such a tough concept to understand.
Bach said:I didn't think Gailey was a great HC. But it only made matters worse when he didn't have control over his staff. He was totally undermined because those assistants knew they answered to Jerry, not to him. Just like most of the players went straight to Jerry, and Jerry let it happen. That's what happens when you don't give your HC the proper authority he deserves.
SultanOfSix;1930822 said:This GM undermining the HC's authority is total nonsense. Last time I checked, the GM is above the HC on the authority scale. You can't undermine someone's authority when you're already above him.
windward;1930821 said:Very well stated. That's been my stance all along, not defend Jerry Jones come hell or highwater.
I refuse to bash Jerry when he has done nothing in my view to deserve such bashing.
Bach;1930828 said:Uh. Yes you can.
SultanOfSix;1930822 said:This GM undermining the HC's authority is total nonsense. Last time I checked, the GM is above the HC on the authority scale. You can't undermine someone's authority when you're already above him.
Rack;1930156 said:So we're going from one of the better secondary coaches in the NFL, Todd Bowles, to this...
Can someone explain to me what happened with Dennis Thurman?!