DMN Update: Roy Williams has sprained left wrist...*results negative*

stasheroo;2888537 said:
The guy did have nearly as many catches as Dallas' entire receiving corps did last season - in 12 games.

Huh? TO, Crayton, Austin, Stanback, and RW11 had 132 receptions between them. How does "65" qualify as "nearly as many catches"?
 
bbgun;2888612 said:
Huh? TO, Crayton, Austin, Stanback, and RW11 had 132 receptions between them. How does "65" qualify as "nearly as many catches"?

Because TO's not here anymore.
 
stasheroo;2888622 said:
Because TO's not here anymore.

But if T.O had not been here last year the rest would have had many more chances and catches.

If you guys cannot see that ..... then there is no point discussing this.
 
Rampage;2888593 said:
and yet missing 4 games because he can't be counted on.

He missed 4 games last year and still had 65 catches?
 
bbgun;2888631 said:
Oh for God's sake. Get your pro-Jones thumb off the scale.

Is the logic that hard to understand?

Owens isn't here anymore.

Matt Jones had nearly as many catches as all of the guys who are.

And he did that in 12 games.

I don't care if you don't like it.

It just happens to be true.
 
zrinkill;2888634 said:
But if T.O had not been here last year the rest would have had many more chances and catches.

If you guys cannot see that ..... then there is no point discussing this.

And what does that prove?

I'm not dealing with hypotheticals, but what the players actually did.

Maybe if Matt Jones had TO on the other side, he would have had much better stats too?
 
stasheroo;2888642 said:
And what does that prove?

I'm not dealing with hypotheticals, but what the players actually did.

So you believe that if Owens had not been here ...... the rest would have gotten the same stats?

:laugh2:
 
zrinkill;2888649 said:
So you believe that if Owens had not been here ...... the rest would have gotten the same stats?

:laugh2:

I believe that I'm not talking about 'if's' but what did happen.

I'm dealing in the reality of what actually happened, unlike some people.
 
stasheroo;2888637 said:
Is the logic that hard to understand?

Owens isn't here anymore.

Matt Jones had nearly as many catches as all of the guys who are.

And he did that in 12 games.

I don't care if you don't like it.

It just happens to be true.

Dude, you cited the entire receiving corps. You made no exceptions for TO. Don't blame me 'cause you're ****ing sloppy.
 
bbgun;2888656 said:
Dude, you cited the entire receiving corps. You made no exceptions for TO. Don't blame me 'cause you're ****ing sloppy.

So bbgun gets an infraction and banned right? He said a bad word.
 
bbgun;2888656 said:
Dude, you cited the entire receiving corps. You made no exceptions for TO. Don't blame me 'cause you're ****ing sloppy.

Dude, is TO here anymore?

I didn't realize that I needed to clue you in on that.
 
SLATEmosphere;2888670 said:
So bbgun gets an infraction and banned right? He said a bad word.

Fail (as usual). It's called letting the filter do its job. Circumventing the filter is the no-no. Lesson over.
 
stasheroo;2888675 said:
Dude, is TO here anymore?

I didn't realize that I needed to clue you in on that.

I have many talents, but mind-reading isn't among them. You stated as a fact that Jones had nearly as many catches as the 2008 crew combined, which is demonstrably false. You're either sloppy or deliberately deceitful. Which is it?
 
bbgun;2888680 said:
Fail (as usual). It's called letting the filter do its job. Circumventing the filter is the no-no. Lesson over.

Let's not talk about fail. Your jokes already do enough of that.
 
Back
Top