- Messages
- 33,722
- Reaction score
- 31,438
RW31 said:I have a name for people like you...It starts with an L and sounds like "hoosiers"...
Loosiers??????
RW31 said:I have a name for people like you...It starts with an L and sounds like "hoosiers"...
Great word huh?Sarge said:Loosiers??????
No, Wed have an Int in the first series and thtexans would've won 22 to 0...SacredStar said:The end result of last nites game would have been the same, Carter or no Carter.
Relax people.
Hostile said:It was a pre season game that was meaningless. I think Parcells is a master at getting a team to respond to losses. I think he uses things like this poor showing to his greatest advantage. As evidence I give you pre season game #1 last year to the Cardinals. He has proven he can take mediocre players and with a solid defense generate 10 wins.
There is no reason on earth for me to believe we can't win that many again. Julius Jones is clearly better than Hambrick. AB looks re-born. We haven't even used Key yet. Henson was clearly a bright spot. Crayton impressed me. McBriar impressed me.
What's out there that I can't be optimistic about? A pre season loss? If that is the best evidence to swamp the year then I consent to being kicked in the nads daily. There's a lot of football left to be played and I expect this team to kick some *** doing it. 40 year old QB or not.
RW31 said:No, Wed have an Int in the first series and thtexans would've won 22 to 0...
Help me educate em Scott. In other words, no lurking on the sidelines. Get in here and kick some negative over reacting ***.scottsp said:This ****ty *** thread is why it's tough for me to post here anymore. Place is flush with 'em. Not all, mind you.
But too many for my taste.
scottsp said:This ****ty *** thread is why it's tough for me to post here anymore. Place is flush with 'em. Not all, mind you.
But too many for my taste.
Hostile said:It was a pre season game that was meaningless. I think Parcells is a master at getting a team to respond to losses. I think he uses things like this poor showing to his greatest advantage. As evidence I give you pre season game #1 last year to the Cardinals. He has proven he can take mediocre players and with a solid defense generate 10 wins.
There is no reason on earth for me to believe we can't win that many again. Julius Jones is clearly better than Hambrick. AB looks re-born. We haven't even used Key yet. Henson was clearly a bright spot. Crayton impressed me. McBriar impressed me.
What's out there that I can't be optimistic about? A pre season loss? If that is the best evidence to swamp the year then I consent to being kicked in the nads daily. There's a lot of football left to be played and I expect this team to kick some *** doing it. 40 year old QB or not.
Ben_n_austin said:It's a new year, Hos. I agree with you on all accounts here and I'm not even wearing my rose colored glasses right now.
It's going to be a good year. The loss means nothing. Talent is all over this team.
SacredStar said:That's the attitude of winners.
You're not allowed to kick me unless you wear your high heels.Ben_n_austin said:~kicking hos in the nads~
JK
It's a new year, Hos. I agree with you on all accounts here and I'm not even wearing my rose colored glasses right now.
It's going to be a good year. The loss means nothing. Talent is all over this team.
Hostile said:Help me educate em Scott. In other words, no lurking on the sidelines. Get in here and kick some negative over reacting ***.
Hostile said:You're not allowed to kick me unless you wear your high heels.
I expect at the end of this year the optimism to be higher than it has been in a long time.
Great post. There was only one thing from last night that truly bothered me. The penalties. I don't care about anything else, but those things can become habits.scottsp said:It's either too much sunshine or too much sky falling. And there are some great posters here. But those who just change with the wind are enough to beat you down.
I'm just glad that in Campo's last season, when Dallas beat the Raiders' *** at Texas Stadium in August, there was NO confusion. I was there that night and anyone who watched that game would tell you that Dallas looked very tough and Oakland...well they looked like utter and complete ****.
Troy Hambrick could do no wrong that night. So, take that for what it's worth. Anyway, I believe the Cowboys won 20-7.
This just in: Dallas went on to win five games that year - for the third season in a row. And the Raiders, what did they do? Try a Super Bowl. But but but but early on in the exhibition season, Dallas totally outclassed 'em. Rich Gannon looked all of 37 years old that evening too.
I sure am glad I could accurately prognosticate the 2002 season based on that outing. Aren't we all?
No I didn't. The little *** things were all there in place of the actual letters. No @ in place a a, or $$ in place of ss. No sir, not guilty.Ben_n_austin said:It's been brought to my attention that you are circumventing the language filters.
This is the 2nd year of a 4 year deal for him. Do the math.Ben_n_austin said:But then The Tuna only has one more year left.
Hostile said:This is the 2nd year of a 4 year deal for him. Do the math.