Do you own a gun?

MapleLeaf

Maple Leaf
Messages
5,207
Reaction score
1,598
Hostile;3323946 said:
This is my "love at first sight" gun.


[youtube]p4ebtj1jR7c[/youtube]


I want one.

...afford to shoot that gun for more than five minutes. Especially the specialist rounds. I can imagine each one of those shells come at a pretty price.
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
25,369
Reaction score
8,142
anyone who wants to own one of those personally is definitely compensating for not having a proper gun attached to his body
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
CanadianCowboysFan;3324398 said:
anyone who wants to own one of those personally is definitely compensating for not having a proper gun attached to his body
:laugh2:
 

CliffnDallas

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,484
Reaction score
215
kimorah86;3324313 said:
I dont own a gun but i want one at the same time i don't. I would love to go to a shooting range to shoot a gun i never did that before

Taking a class at a local range, then renting several guns would be a good place to start.
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
CanadianCowboysFan;3324398 said:
anyone who wants to own one of those personally is definitely compensating for not having a proper gun attached to his body

Canada_flag.jpg
 

MetalHead

Benched
Messages
6,031
Reaction score
2
CanadianCowboysFan;3324398 said:
anyone who wants to own one of those personally is definitely compensating for not having a proper gun attached to his body


I read that,then your sig and your cologne thread...self explanatory.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
davidyee;3324386 said:
...afford to shoot that gun for more than five minutes. Especially the specialist rounds. I can imagine each one of those shells come at a pretty price.
This monster will never be allowed outside of the military. That is probably a good thing.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
CanadianCowboysFan;3324398 said:
anyone who wants to own one of those personally is definitely compensating for not having a proper gun attached to his body
You're the same guy who can't get it from your own wife whenever you want it, and you talk about my equipment?
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
Hostile;3324454 said:
This monster will never be allowed outside of the military. That is probably a good thing.

I agree - you don't want that in the wrong hands. Leave it to the military so they can do what they need to do. Also, don't let the Chinese or Russians get it or next thing you know it'll be in the hands of Islamic terrorists.
 

kimorah86

New Member
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
As long as I have live in VA I have no idea where a gun range is let me know if you find out
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
SaltwaterServr;3323486 said:
It's not exactly easy to purchase or maintain ownership of an automatic weapon. A whack job with an organic chemistry book from a local library, a credit card, and a Home Depot nearby could do more damage than they whack job your worried about.

I do think they make a point of monitoring suspicious consumption of products involved in creating mass explosives now so the argument isn't entirely proper.

I don't think the purpose of the constitution was to allow anyone to own any weapon of his choice. They just didn't have weapons of this nature back then so they couldn't predict what sort of weapons would be available in the future. In the same way not just anyone should be allowed to own a nuclear warhead, there are certain types of military grade weaponry that shouldn't be accessible to the general public.

Handguns, rifles and shotguns serve legitimate civilian purposes. Other higher grade weapons serve mostly combat purposes. A line has to be drawn in the sand at some point and it is up to responsible legislators informed by a variety of knowledgeable forces without major conflicts of interest to decide where that should be.
 

rkell87

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,443
Reaction score
880
Eskimo;3324482 said:
I do think they make a point of monitoring suspicious consumption of products involved in creating mass explosives now so the argument isn't entirely proper.

I don't think the purpose of the constitution was to allow anyone to own any weapon of his choice. They just didn't have weapons of this nature back then so they couldn't predict what sort of weapons would be available in the future. In the same way not just anyone should be allowed to own a nuclear warhead, there are certain types of military grade weaponry that shouldn't be accessible to the general public.

Handguns, rifles and shotguns serve legitimate civilian purposes. Other higher grade weapons serve mostly combat purposes. A line has to be drawn in the sand at some point and it is up to responsible legislators informed by a variety of knowledgeable forces without major conflicts of interest to decide where that should be.
no they really don't go do zugg.com its a comedy website and the guy does social experiments all the time but one of the stories he did was buying very large quantities of everything needed for fertilizer bombs and other things it is easy to get anything that can be made into explosives.
 

rkell87

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,443
Reaction score
880
Hostile;3324458 said:
You're the same guy who can't get it from your own wife whenever you want it, and you talk about my equipment?
SNAP!:eek:
 

SaltwaterServr

Blank Paper Offends Me
Messages
8,124
Reaction score
1
Eskimo;3324482 said:
I do think they make a point of monitoring suspicious consumption of products involved in creating mass explosives now so the argument isn't entirely proper.

I don't think the purpose of the constitution was to allow anyone to own any weapon of his choice. They just didn't have weapons of this nature back then so they couldn't predict what sort of weapons would be available in the future. In the same way not just anyone should be allowed to own a nuclear warhead, there are certain types of military grade weaponry that shouldn't be accessible to the general public.

Handguns, rifles and shotguns serve legitimate civilian purposes. Other higher grade weapons serve mostly combat purposes. A line has to be drawn in the sand at some point and it is up to responsible legislators informed by a variety of knowledgeable forces without major conflicts of interest to decide where that should be.

Diesel fuel and high nitrogen content fertilizer are monitored? Toluene? Benzene? You might not drive up to Lowe's and pick it all up at one stop, but spread it out over a large city with both Home Depots and Lowe's, and whatever other shops there, and you'll have plenty of bang.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
as soon as someone talks about owning a nuclear weapon, all credibility disapears.
 

kapolani

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,438
Reaction score
374
CliffnMesquite;3325467 said:
I like that. I'm researching Bushmaster right now. What kind of optics are those?

It's a red dot. Vortex Strikefire. $150 shipped. I can't see myself spending $500 - $1k for an optic on a 'fun' gun.

For a combat rifle I wouldn't put anything less than an ACOG on it.

Been getting some good reviews so I bought a couple to throw on my plinking guns. There are even reports that LEO's have been equpping this optic.

Great product for the price.
 
Top