Whether Dak is better than Romo was is completely irrelevant. Romo isn't an option. The question is only if Dak is the best option or if pursuing another QB would be the better way to go.
a top 10 qb isn't going anywhere. he in fact whether its not your opinion facts show his rankings 7-10 easily before the calf he was on fires and in the mvp convo, top 5 etc
theres no better options whether drafted or giving up draft capital for who? that are truly better? i mean so much better its worth losing draft picks and cap money.
sorry but
too bad dak cant block and tackle himself or make those grown azz OL not hold and get 14 penalties in playoff game. I mean its all him. right get the pluck over it haters. it was easy to see the Offensive line torpedo this game and add the DL getting 3 offsides penalties i mean hard to win against equal talent when you make the big mistakes all game. hard to play 1st and 20 every series when the other teams playing 1st and 10..thats a reality, when they dont hold they aren't blocking well and daks running for his life.
for the OP I was the biggest romo fan here and while id take Romo over Dak, dak has come long way and now i believe hes on the same level. they both can't win when their teammates fail around them, they aren't elite but top 10 qbs dont grow on trees.
hes not the one who lost this last game we saw 14 penalties do that, most games hes not the issue, hes not missing FGs, blocks, tackles, dropping passes, curtain glare ,or calling bad plays.
this is team game always has been and yes dak like other qbs have soem bad moments but most games especially last week's payoff loss is not on him..