Money...money...money. There is plenty of current talent to do the job as we talk. If a top shelf lineman was brought aboard prior to now, who you giving up instead...Lamb or Parsons.
"Dak lovers" exist.And when the Cowboys win and win big, there's a large enough population who return to the threads ready to praise his efforts and mock the Dak haters after his latest triumph.
It's funny how you all conveniently forget that as if the opposite of the "Dak haters" doesn't exist.
My point stands - and fairly strongly at that.
"Dak lovers" exist.
And while there are a FEW that absolutely refuse to place any blame on Dak, even when he clearly plays poorly, to act like the numbers are the same as those that refuse to give Dak any credit, even when he clearly plays great, is hilarious, at best. And an outright lack of integrity at worse.
But I believe what "Dak Haters" would call "the opposite of the Dak haters" is the rational fans that point out when Dak does good which causes the "Dak Haters" to absolutely loose their collective ____.
Like can we NOT acknowledge when Dak plays a great game or makes a great throw without the "Dak Haters" rushing in with some illogical "but ...." to try and refute anything said positively about the Cowboys QB? (Notice I didn't say Dak there, because the same thing happened to Romo too)
If those that act like "Dak Haters" don't want to be "mocked", don't continually push ignorant takes that does not line up with reality.
Just say you were wrong and apologize like a mature person."Dak lovers" exist.
And while there are a FEW that absolutely refuse to place any blame on Dak, even when he clearly plays poorly, to act like the numbers are the same as those that refuse to give Dak any credit, even when he clearly plays great, is hilarious, at best. And an outright lack of integrity at worse.
But I believe what "Dak Haters" would call "the opposite of the Dak haters" is the rational fans that point out when Dak does good which causes the "Dak Haters" to absolutely loose their collective ____.
Like can we NOT acknowledge when Dak plays a great game or makes a great throw without the "Dak Haters" rushing in with some illogical "but ...." to try and refute anything said positively about the Cowboys QB? (Notice I didn't say Dak there, because the same thing happened to Romo too)
If those that act like "Dak Haters" don't want to be "mocked", don't continually push ignorant takes that does not line up with reality.
Do you? Dak has a masters degree. Do you?
Well, he would be more successful if he used his degrees instead of trying the QB routine. However, he did good at football also, made him tons of money with nothing to show for it...so far.
First, your statement doesn't make sense in regard to your anti-Dak points, i.e., why would the anti-Dak crowd say the defense was weak after a win led by Dak?
No. What Dak has is a brain that doesn't work quite fast enough. He reminds me of Ryan Fitzpatrick, same thing. As a QB, you not only have to see the field and read the D, you have to do it in nanoseconds. Not a suprise that most QBs struggle w/ it.
The "bulk" of something doesn't mean ALL of something but a large portion of it.
Imagine believing you are acting like a "mature person" then crying that you get mocked about your terrible and delusional opinions. Oh, nevermind.Just say you were wrong and apologize like a mature person.
No need to go through rhetorical gymnastics because you feel outnumbered and, thus, have a legitimate point.
I know what I said and what I meant.
The truth is that after Dak plays well, there are MULTIPLE posts calling out the "Dak haters," asking "where are they" in light of Dak's overwhelming performance that lead to a win.
Furthermore, in my initial post I didn't say there was an equal number of "Dak lovers" to "Dak haters." What I said is this ...
"Bulk" has nothing to do with the population of the critics or supporters but the degree of the credit or blame.
And it (credit or blame) can be made by people here, commentators in sports studios or general fans.
Sigh, and to think I get paid for educating people's children. If only I could reap the benefits for schooling their parents.
No, it's just that his brain doesn't work fast enough. That is normal for NFL QB's, not rare at all. Only a very few have brains that work fast enough to know where to throw in 1.4 seconds.
How in hades do you guys not get tired of this?Imagine believing you are acting like a "mature person" then crying that you get mocked about your terrible and delusional opinions. Oh, nevermind.
And imagine trying to "school an adult" as a teacher when the education is at an all-time low because teachers more concerned about "social issues" than Reading, Writing, Arithmetic and Science. Oh, nevermind.
You may THINK you have power because you grade papers, but in reality, it's probably more like "those that can't do, teach".
Oh so sorry, that was so immature of me to point out.
0 timeouts and less than 30 seconds on 2nd down.
Steele BARELY touched his guy and you believe that a QB who is not a rookie, and who is in the same situation, NEVER take a sack there?
That's the hill (play) you want to die on?
Actually Mensa does not have a Mississippi chapter because they found the IQ of Mississipians to be un-quantifiable
He never saw it coming. That's the problem. As an NFL QB, you absolutely must see the pressure coming. Throw the ball into the stands, fine, but DO NOT take a sack.
