- Messages
- 78,665
- Reaction score
- 43,018
One has nothing to do with the other.
Both teams got rid of their #1 receiver for salary cap purposes.....huh?One has nothing to do with the other.
People really think Jerry coming out and saying what he said is why we didn't get more lol. These owners/gm's all talk lol. They know when guys are getting released and they know if they want to trade for them.so did the az gm come out and say they were getting rid of Hopkins no matter what?
The technically were a better overall team without Cooper. Yes, our QB missed him at times. But the locker room didn't and him leaving took's Lamb's game to another level that even Cooper isn't at.Yeah we didn’t miss him at all last year….smh
We had Noah brown and a gimpy Gallup.
I’d argue it cost us a few games. We could’ve cut him this off-season just as easily.
This is a interesting take, I agree.There was no blow. It was a smart move unloading the contract of a receiver who just lost his job to Lamb. You don't make that guy your #2 after that. lol
Agree! Amari was still considered a top end WR. People were saying he saved our season when he got here. Hopkins was a legit “best WR in NFL” and then a steep dropoff. Two different stories. Also market was hotter for WRs when Amari traded. People were getting crazy value…but is. The revisionist history here for the FO is nutsOne has nothing to do with the other.
Half the board wanted to give up a 2nd rounder for him tooIsn't it crazy that Cowboys essentially couldn't get much more than a 5th for Amari and Cardinals can't find any takers for Hopkins? Do you guys still fault the front office for not being able to get much for Amari?
Right. I said it in another thread. People wanted to trade a 3rd for Cooks....and trade a 2nd for D Hop.....just for both to be available for less. And then these same fans get mad when the front office doesn't listen to them lol.Half the board wanted to give up a 2nd rounder for him too
That's completely lacking context.Both teams got rid of their #1 receiver for salary cap purposes.....huh?
No completely different. Amari was relatively healthy, only 27, and was viewed at the time as a fringe top 10 WR (at worst fringe top 15).Isn't it crazy that Cowboys essentially couldn't get much more than a 5th for Amari and Cardinals can't find any takers for Hopkins? Do you guys still fault the front office for not being able to get much for Amari?
Kinda what I was thinking. Trying to connect those dots wasn't really working.One has nothing to do with the other.
Hopkins is 30 years old and when healthy a top 10 receiver. Superior to anything Amari has ever been.No completely different. Amari was relatively healthy, only 27, and was viewed at the time as a fringe top 10 WR (at worst fringe top 15).
Hopkins has missed 14 games the last 2 years, is 32, and rumor has it wanted a big dollar extension when his current extension hadn't even hit the books yet.
That's typically what happens when guys get older and sign 100 million dollar contracts.We turned a first round pick into a 5th rounder in short order. THAT is a FAIL! You can mince your words, but we turned a Ferrari into a burnt out Fiero.
If you guys don't see any thing parallel in the situations tis because you don't want to.Kinda what I was thinking. Trying to connect those dots wasn't really working.
Hopkins is 30 years old not 32. And the reason he's missed time is because of being suspended. Two years ago he got hurt.That's completely lacking context.
One of them was 32 and had missed a combined 14 games in the last 2 years.
The other was 27, had only missed 2 games combined the last 2 years, and was viewed as a fringe top 10 WR.
YepThat's typically what happens when guys get older and sign 100 million dollar contracts.