WoodysGirl;1955976 said:
you forgot to add...on the field. Folks just wanna see it to know that it exists.
This team has leaders. But we don't have the on-field rah rah guys. This is the same argument people gave during the coaching search last year. Need a guy with fire in his belly who'll give this team life. Whatever.
This team went 13-3 and came up small when it mattered. The onus is on the players...the CURRENT players...to get it done.
I've heard all about who our off-the-field leaders are for the LB corp. Then, I watched him ***** about his standing with the organization less than 24 hours after the team lost another playoff game. Not quite impressed that this current group of LBs looks up to a whiny player who's been trying to get off this team for three years, now.
Thomas is a guy who can really show these guys how to work, study, and prepare - and he's got the skins on the wall to set that example, unlike our current estrogen-riddled veteran "leader".
I don't give a flying **** if I "see" it or not. You can see by the results on the field that it's not getting it done.
You seem to be under the impression that acquiring Thomas would represent some plan for the future. He doesn't. He provides a service we need. Bellichick has been acquiring players to fill specific roles for years now, and has built a defense that can be had a little bit, but rises to the occasion at the urging of a smart, clutch group of LBs. We can do that, and not have it represent a move away from a youth movement and planning for the future.