Ellis says D.Ware hid from coaches...w/audio Post#77

Four;2836267 said:
good lord, you can't handle people having a differing view than you to the point I have to be in denial?

and I am a queen now, lovely how you guys resort to name calling and innuendo.

good show.
Click to expand...


no need to get your panties all bunched up.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:
 
Four;2836263 said:
what does that mean? that greg should be able to keep up with a WR?

I don't know the play you are referring to off hand, but we all know greg looked awkward at best in coverage.
Click to expand...
he didn't have to "keep up with a wr" he just failed to make the tackle. it was the the 1st amani Toomer td in our last playoff game.
 
Mash;2836072 said:
Greg is the perfect example of a player that...

Plays the game for the money.......there are alot of them out there....and he is one of them.

Like I said....perfect match for him in Oakland....no wonder Greg turned down a opportunity to play in NE and try to get a ring........its all about the money.....even when Greg tries to say its not........it is....
Click to expand...

Whats wrong with playing for the money as long as you give it your all on the field?
 
speedkilz88;2836269 said:
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

"panties bunched up" is a common phrase if "queen of denial" is common then I apologize, I haven't ever heard it.

what I said is not remotely calling you a queen, though you have been reaching this entire thread, don't expect you to stop.

keep on keeping on, look at how cool everyone thinks you are for "pwning" me.

you rock. no really, you do.
 
SLATEmosphere;2836128 said:
Ellis isn't even that legit where I could maybe see where he's coming from when he said "I could have made those plays". I don't know if he would of to be honest.

Spencer>Ellis run support.
Click to expand...


With all the evidence we had available there is no way you could say Spencer is better than Ellis in run support.

I like Spencer, I think he has a bright future, but Ellis was still better than him at just about everything.
 
greg sucked in coverage, that play has nothing to do with the entire premise of the arguement.

twist twist twist, you guys really don't think you are biased?

that's just silliness.
 
Four;2836306 said:
"panties bunched up" is a common phrase if "queen of denial" is common then I apologize, I haven't ever heard it.

what I said is not remotely calling you a queen, though you have been reaching this entire thread, don't expect you to stop.

keep on keeping on, look at how cool everyone thinks you are for "pwning" me.

you rock. no really, you do.
Click to expand...
It's quite common.
 
CATCH17;2836307 said:
With all the evidence we had available there is no way you could say Spencer is better than Ellis in run support.

I like Spencer, I think he has a bright future, but Ellis was still better than him at just about everything.
Click to expand...


ya they have stats to back that opinion up.

but there are stats to back up pacman as our best corner last season, and I think that is complete BS too.
 
Four;2836238 said:
well actually he prefaced what he said with he is not bashing, and during and after.

that way you put it sounds worse to me, and I take that as bias.

twisting the facts to suit your point. That's how I see that post of yours you quoted.
Click to expand...

It's called classic passive agressive Greg Ellis.

He tells you he's not complianing while he's complaining.

He wasn't trying to bash Anthony Spencer while he was bashing Anthony Spencer.

Wake up already.
 
Four;2836314 said:
greg sucked in coverage, that play has nothing to do with the entire premise of the arguement.

twist twist twist, you guys really don't think you are biased?

that's just silliness.
Click to expand...

Sucked in coverage?:lmao2:

That was the lamest attempt at a tackle I've seen since Mike Jenkins.
 
speedkilz88;2836316 said:
It's quite common.
Click to expand...


I have never heard it.

a quick google search indicates it was a song, and the only other references to it are women admitted they were wrong about something.

so again, inuendo.

now who's the "queen of denial?"

please just drop it though, I generally don't dislike your posts and this childish crap has almost pushed me to put you on ignore, just agree to disagree and move on. No hard feelings.
 
CATCH17;2836318 said:
I have no earthly idea what any of those numbers mean but if you watch the games its not even close... yet.
Click to expand...
I think it's pretty safe to say it's "close." Heck, I'd argue that the fact that Wade played Spencer more on run downs is damn good evidence that he is already better. If there's anything I know, it's that Ellis was not a significantly better OLB in 2008.
 
Doomsday101;2835943 said:
Owens was disrputive during the season and Ellis leading up to camp. Off season is the time if you have complaints to says something.
Click to expand...

Ellis went to Jerry to complain about the defense during the year (so did Tank). I agree, complaining in the offseason is the best way to do it.

To my knowledge, Owens talked about wanting the ball more (what WR in the league doesn't say that?) and in private went to Garrett about wanting the ball more and in private supposedly said he didn't respect Garrett. Greg's attitude was made public, Owens did it in private. Ellis wanted out of Dallas, Owens wanted to stay in Dallas.

Hey, they're are both gone and there's only so much time I am going to deal talking about them. But from my perspective Ellis was a bigger problem and headache than Owens and didn't produce nearly as much. Like I said, I was disappointed that Owens was released at first because it made zero sense to me that somebody like Ellis could still be on the team. But since Ellis has been released, it makes much more sense to me that they released Owens as well.




YAKUZA
 
SLATEmosphere;2836320 said:
Sucked in coverage?:lmao2:

That was the lamest attempt at a tackle I've seen since Mike Jenkins.
Click to expand...


the guy cut back and greg misjudged.

then he got knocked out of the play by his own guy.

and again it has nothing to do with anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

... and 69 more.
Total: 5,548 (members: 169, guests: 5,379)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,215
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top