CowboysFaninHouston
CowboysFaninDC
- Messages
- 34,998
- Reaction score
- 20,090
I agree. he is not top 5....no denying that.It's absolutely ridiculous to suggest Prescott is top 5.
I agree. he is not top 5....no denying that.It's absolutely ridiculous to suggest Prescott is top 5.
the only choice is to go gambling in the draft. or there are a few here with Rush Crush...go figure
he led dallas to playoffs and the division round going 1-1 in the playoffs. dallas offense was top 10, where you only focus on TDs and interceptions to try to prove a point (and into past history of it), he was key part of leading that offense. Dallas was also top 10 passing team in the league. only 13th in rushing. coming off 1990 has nothing to do with 1991. you are reaching back in history to prove the current doesn't matter. makes no sense. he was a key part of that team. there is absolutely no denying it.In 1991 Troy Aikman wasn't anything.
He was coming off an 11 TD 18 INT season in 1990.
Aikman was 100% not a difference maker in 1991.
Drew Brees missed 5 games with injury in 2019. Teddy bridgewater went 4-1 in his absence. Does that same logic line apply?
so therein lies the challenge. is it easier and higher probability of winning if we go draft one. most probably need a high, top 5 pick...or do you try and build a team around Dak given that he may not be top 5, but among better QBs in the league that can win....yes, its riskyYea, just an incredibly risky option IMO. I imagine we’d be picking bottom half of the first the next few years and the hit rate on even average NFL QBs is low.
And for fans that want an upgrade from our current QB the hit rate is even lower.
so therein lies the challenge. is it easier and higher probability of winning if we go draft one. most probably need a high, top 5 pick...or do you try and build a team around Dak given that he may not be top 5, but among better QBs in the league that can win....yes, its risky
I agree. he is not top 5....no denying that.
I think its about consistency....he has some quarters or games where you just scratch your head and then he has ones that you go wow....Bird in the hand for me…Dak has had stretches of playing like a top 5 at times and consistently been at least a top 10 IMO.
Plenty good enough to win a Super Bowl just needs a solid team around him…like most QBs.
Similar player to Stafford IMO.
People keep saying it's ridiculous, but I don't see all of these great QBs around the league. Besides maybe 2 QBs, no one impresses me all that much. And I'm supposedly a Dak hater.
I think its about consistency....he has some quarters or games where you just scratch your head and then he has ones that you go wow....
there is defintely a changing of the guards....for me a top 5 is not an annual competition, to be elite which is what most equate a top 5 QB to, you have to have done it several years at a high level. so right now, Mahomes, Allen, Brady still, rodgers falling off but was top 5, Burrow on the edge (two years and counting). these 5 we can argue about being top 5, or elite...the rest varies from year to year.People keep saying it's ridiculous, but I don't see all of these great QBs around the league. Besides maybe 2 QBs, no one impresses me all that much. And I'm supposedly a Dak hater.
oh, if I wasn't clear, no QB has good play each pass attempt, or good play every quarter and every game....there are definite ups and downs. every QB, inclduing Manning, Brady, etc. made bad throws, bad decisions, etc. its just that they make more good plays than bad ones. some of these pundits take a throw and analyze it to death or take a quarter and just pound it...you can never analyze a QB in a silo.That’s fair, but that’s basically every QB in football. If you look long term at almost every QB metric out there he’s top 10 which speaks to him being more consistent than most. The good far outweighs the bad.
After his defense gave up a whopping 3 points in the divisional round.Allen has took his team to the Conference Championship.
Dak meanwhile....
Yeah, I mentioned Allen's poor play the last few weeks in my initial post. Imagine if Dak fumbled a snap to lose the game?
I was never a big Dak fan. But looking around the league right now, I'm kind of glad we have him. There's not a lot of really good QBs out there.
The one thing that bothers me about Dak, when was the last time Dallas was down and Dak drove them to a late 4th quarter victory? I don't mean ties. Losing late in the 4th, Dak to the rescue. Does he ever do that?
To my point...No he hasn't.
He's still Mahomes. The QB that literally everyone could see was a generational talent.
To my point...
Let me know if you want some private sessions on breaking down players.
there is defintely a changing of the guards....for me a top 5 is not an annual competition, to be elite which is what most equate a top 5 QB to, you have to have done it several years at a high level. so right now, Mahomes, Allen, Brady still, rodgers falling off but was top 5, Burrow on the edge (two years and counting). these 5 we can argue about being top 5, or elite...the rest varies from year to year.
everyone was touting Murray and he has been awful this year. cousins just can't win big games and shrinks in big moments worse than anybody else. Herbert is in the conversation. Derek Carr can be top 10 one year, bottom 5 another. if we complain about Dak's inconsistency, then Carr is even worse. not sure what happened to wilson. perhaps it was Carroll, given how they are doing with Geno smith who has bounced from team to team to team and seemingly found his niche now! people were annointing Mac Jones and he has crashed to earth. stafford was top 10, perhaps just outside of top 5 or beign elite, but he seemed to have lost interest after he got his ring. so in short, yeah, Dak is in the conversation for the 5 to 10 range for sure.
oh, if I wasn't clear, no QB has good play each pass attempt, or good play every quarter and every game....there are definite ups and downs. every QB, inclduing Manning, Brady, etc. made bad throws, bad decisions, etc. its just that they make more good plays than bad ones. some of these pundits take a throw and analyze it to death or take a quarter and just pound it...you can never analyze a QB in a silo.
Well yeah, but you don't have to be elite to be top 5. Just not have 5 elite QBs in the league. There you go. Once Rodgers and Brady are out, there will not be 5 elite QBs in this league. There might not be 5 elite QBs right now.
How much of a loser can one person prove to be in a single post?
A. Not everybody is broke. $10 a month for live sports every night. (plus some articles) is a fair enough deal.
B. The Cowboys haven't made an NFL semi final in 27 years, and you think the fan base hates to much? They don't hate enough.
C. Zeke earned his money? Is this satire? He has the most guaranteed money of any RB alive and has declined every year since signing. (At a luxury position mind you.)