ESPN: Sizing up Seattle's chances against Cowboys

SLATEmosphere;3044320 said:
You and your "93 + 94=187 beatdown" are pretty whack...
Click to expand...

So do you actually talk football? Or just spout off one liners calling people names all while having an avatar of a player that is not only not a cowboy but not even an in the same sport? Lebron belongs on a football meassage board just as much as gretzky does. It just doesn't add up. Even with the improved grammar your post still has no value to it whatsoever. No effort and no validity.
 
SLATEmosphere;3044316 said:
Wow. Didn't know we had the grammar police out.

You're. Better?
Click to expand...

grammar_police_car_203x152.jpg
 
Hawksfan81;3044327 said:
So do you actually talk football? Or just spout off one liners calling people names all while having an avatar of a player that is not only not a cowboy but not even an in the same sport? Lebron belongs on a football meassage board just as much as gretzky does. It just doesn't add up. Even with the improved grammar your post still has no value to it whatsoever. No effort and no validity.
Click to expand...

What would you like to talk about?
 
SLATEmosphere;3044398 said:
What would you like to talk about?
Click to expand...

All I am saying man is if you want to talk smack instead of name calling and offering nothing to the board throw some football talk in there. Nothing wrong with a little knowledgeable trash talk. Thats part of the deal. Like what Beast_From_The_East did. He had some nice back handed comments in there that he put a little thought into. I thought it was pretty good and deserved a real response. Thats all part of the fun. The one line name calling is lame though man.
 
Hawksfan81;3044409 said:
All I am saying man is if you want to talk smack instead of name calling and offering nothing to the board throw some football talk in there. Nothing wrong with a little knowledgeable trash talk. Thats part of the deal. Like what Beast_From_The_East did. He had some nice back handed comments in there that he put a little thought into. I thought it was pretty good and deserved a real response. Thats all part of the fun. The one line name calling is lame though man.
Click to expand...

You are asking a bit much from the guy. He has improved to more than one or two word sentences (without one of the words being "fail"), so there is progress, but take it easy on him. :D
 
they have as good of a chance as the chiefs did.

a very small one, but this is the nfl.
 
Hawksfan81;3044280 said:
I am more over the super bowl than you are over the greased ball conspiracy theory apparantely. We had our chances to make plays and we didn't get it done. Dropped passes killed us. The refs didn't help, but we should have been able to overcome that. We were the better team between the twenty yard lines but we just couldn't put points on the board. At the end of the day we failed to accomplish our mission. Thats about all there is to it.
Click to expand...

Echh. Your more over that officiating than I am. That game still sticks in my craw.

Yes, you could have played better and overcome the bad calls, but there's no way you should have had to. That was a joke. The block in the back on Harrison's run-back against AZ last year, right in front of the ref, was just as bad.
 
Idgit;3044467 said:
Echh. Your more over that officiating than I am. That game still sticks in my craw.

Yes, you could have played better and overcome the bad calls, but there's no way you should have had to. That was a joke. The block in the back on Harrison's run-back against AZ last year, right in front of the ref, was just as bad.
Click to expand...

I don't have the exact numbers but john clayton has mentioned on radio stations up here many times that in super bowls the steelers win there is a very large, suspecious penalty advantage for the steelers. For what its worth.
 
Hawksfan81;3044472 said:
I don't have the exact numbers but john clayton has mentioned on radio stations up here many times that in super bowls the steelers win there is a very large, suspecious penalty advantage for the steelers. For what its worth.
Click to expand...

I'm the last guy to post about conspiracy theories normally, but PIT sure does get its share of favorable calls. That (was it 2005?) season was about the worst I've ever seen, though.
 
BAT;3044452 said:
You are asking a bit much from the guy. He has improved to more than one or two word sentences (without one of the words being "fail"), so there is progress, but take it easy on him. :D
Click to expand...

I was not aware of the situation. At least there is progress. lol.
 
Idgit;3044475 said:
I'm the last guy to post about conspiracy theories normally, but PIT sure does get its share of favorable calls. That (was it 2005?) season was about the worst I've ever seen, though.
Click to expand...

Yeah. it was the 2005 season and the 2006 super bowl. Good year. Bad super bowl.
 
Hawksfan81;3044327 said:
So do you actually talk football? Or just spout off one liners calling people names all while having an avatar of a player that is not only not a cowboy but not even an in the same sport? Lebron belongs on a football meassage board just as much as gretzky does. It just doesn't add up. Even with the improved grammar your post still has no value to it whatsoever. No effort and no validity.
Click to expand...

He's the same guy who openly gloats about injuries to other team's players. All you really need to know.
 
SaltwaterServr;3044671 said:
He's the same guy who openly gloats about injuries to other team's players. All you really need to know.
Click to expand...

True. You post on the blue also dont you?
 
Hawksfan81;3044472 said:
I don't have the exact numbers but john clayton has mentioned on radio stations up here many times that in super bowls the steelers win there is a very large, suspecious penalty advantage for the steelers. For what its worth.
Click to expand...

Tell us about it.;)

Two of the Cowboys three Super Bowl losses were to the Steelers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 84 more.
Total: 967 (members: 184, guests: 783)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,917
Messages
13,905,044
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top