ESPN's 5 most deadly hitters

[Bob Sacamano]

homer Cowboys fan

:laugh2: oh the irony, you're the freakin' homer here

 

[yazzmode621]

how convenient

lmao. How convenient? I stated that I was talking about the first game from the get go.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

here's an idea yazz, why don't you go to ES and proclaim the greatness that is Sean Taylor

 

[theogt]

I showed more proof than any Cowboys fan has.

Such as what? You claimed he was in Cover 2 - you were WRONG. You claimed TO lined up on the right - you were WRONG.

I'd just like to know why you think Taylor wasn't responsible for that TD. And if he wasn't, who was?

 

[apickmans]

Who cares? You're still dead or, in this case, down by another touchdown

What it comes down to is that I dont think Smoot will play as bad for us as he did for Minnesota. Call it being a homer, whatever. I've seen what he can do for us and when he played, he showed a hell of a lot more than Wright.

 

[yazzmode621]

can I see a link to any of this?

TDs given up are the most accurate gauge of a secondary player's play

It was posted up by a Skins fan. And TDs given up are not necessarily the most accurate way to judge a DB's play. For one, it is really hard to attribute TDs to Safetys. Two, a lot of times players hold or PI just so they dont give up the big play(i.e. multiple times in the second Skins-Boys game Cowboys DBs did this).

 

[Bob Sacamano]

It was posted up by a Skins fan.

ok, then you can post it again here

you don't mind if I don't trust your circle jerk do you?

And TDs given up are not necessarily the most accurate way to judge a DB's play. For one, it is really hard to attribute TDs to Safetys.

no it's not, I could tell you the # of TDs Roy Williams gave up and Patrick Watkins

 

[yazzmode621]

Such as what? You claimed he was in Cover 2 - you were WRONG. You claimed TO lined up on the right - you were WRONG.

I'd just like to know why you think Taylor wasn't responsible for that TD. And if he wasn't, who was?

And you know I am wrong because? And no, you're a Cowboys fans or because someone else looked at the tape and without any knowledge of the exact play being called determines so are not any more 'proof' than what I have shown.

Archuleta.

 

[yazzmode621]

ok, then you can post it again here



no it's not, I could tell you the # of TDs Roy Williams gave up and Patrick Watkins

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3619286&postcount=107

You can guess the number of TDs they have given up but you dont know for sure.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

And you know I am wrong because? And no, you're a Cowboys fans or because someone else looked at the tape and without any knowledge of the exact play being called determines so are not any more 'proof' than what I have shown.

Archuleta.

so a defensive coach talking to Archuleta is showing what coverage is being run? :laugh2:

 

[LowTech]

I'll end this debate now....

Roy is Great


Taylor sucks





See how easy that was

 

[Bob Sacamano]

http://www.extremeskins.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3619286&postcount=107

You can guess the number of TDs they have given up but you dont know for sure.

no, I want to see the link from KC Joyner

and yes, I know for sure

 

[yazzmode621]

you don't mind if I don't trust your circle jerk do you?

No. Just like how I dont trust none of the ridiculous statements I see on this website all the time.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

No. Just like how I dont trust none of the ridiculous statements I see on this website all the time.

since when are facts ridiculous?

 

[yazzmode621]

no, I want to see the link from KC Joyner

and yes, I know for sure

Since I dont have any of KC Joyner's books nor do I have a link to where he/if he said this online, I can't provide that for you.

And no you don't know for sure.

 

[theogt]

And you know I am wrong because? And no, you're a Cowboys fans or because someone else looked at the tape and without any knowledge of the exact play being called determines so are not any more 'proof' than what I have shown.

Archuleta.

Your entire argument that it shouldn't have been attributed to Taylor was that it wasn't his responsibility because he was in a Cover 2.

Taylor was the only deep safety. How can that possibly be a Cover 2?

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Since I dont have any of KC Joyner's books nor do I have a link to where he/if he said this online, I can't provide that for you.

And no you don't know for sure.

I watched the Cowboy games, and have other posters to back me up, so yes, I know for sure

 

[yazzmode621]

since when are facts ridiculous?

You can keep telling yourself that everything that gets said on this website is fact. That's your problem not mine.

 

[yazzmode621]

I watched the Cowboy games, and have other posters to back me up, so yes, I know for sure

If you choose to believe that then that is your choice but just because you have a few of your fellow Cowboys fan buddies backing you up doesnt make it fact. I am done trying to explain this to you.

 

[yazzmode621]

Your entire argument that it shouldn't have been attributed to Taylor was that it wasn't his responsibility because he was in a Cover 2.

Taylor was the only deep safety. How can that possibly be a Cover 2?

Archuleta was back there too until he bit on Witten's route, leaving his area of the field unmanned. I have already stated this and am repeating myself.