goshan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,656
- Reaction score
- 888
Also forgot to mention in my post above regarding the meta data, as Denim Chicken mentions above, that meta data can be tampered with pretty easily. And based on what little research I have done, it's almost impossible to prove the data has been tampered with. .
There are other issues as well, such as the timing of the camera in and of itself. This is a pretty old article and I'm not sure what the state of the technology is now and whether courts consider metadata even reliable, but it does give a background perspective:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...06/04/are_the_duke_lacrosse_photos_legit.html
That being the case, I hardly doubt our now infamous DM hoe and groupie has the knowledge or know-how to tamper with metadata, even if basic, and if the NFL did, that's another issue. If she actually did tamper with it, that's tampering with evidence and illegal, which is a whole different issue.
It's quite a stretch to think she would be smart enough to change the dates/time stamps on the photos.